|
|
|
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 02:46pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
APG has posted the procedure for DQ. A player is not disqualified until the covering official informs the coach. If the official failed to notice or interpret correctly the scorer's outstretched hand, then the player was not in fact disqualified.
So, to handle the situation in the OP, the officials should have done just what they did: DQ the player at that point, no additional penalties on anyone, and play on. Handling the AD is a different matter. He has no business threatening officials in order to get a call to go his way, and such behavior needs to be reported to the conference commissioner/assignor and probably the state. And aside from that, he was wrong.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. 
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Not notified of 5th foul | 3pointer9 | Basketball | 14 | Tue Jan 15, 2013 02:30pm |
| Common Shooting Foul Followed by a Technical Foul | tophat67 | Basketball | 9 | Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:57am |
| Foul where distance gained prior to foul | wwcfoa43 | Football | 15 | Sun Feb 20, 2011 06:04pm |
| Anger over referee's foul calls triggers a bigger foul after game | BktBallRef | Basketball | 10 | Mon Mar 06, 2006 02:36am |
| What is a reasonable time you expect to be notified for a game that's been cancelled? | spots101 | Baseball | 12 | Fri Jun 14, 2002 06:06am |
Hybrid Mode
