The Official Forum
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   NFHS Bonus 1 & 1 question (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/93187-nfhs-bonus-1-1-question.html)

HawkeyeCubP Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:49am
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef (Post 866123)
Or a foul against an airborne shooter.
I'm stumped. How would a foul against an airborne shooter (A1) ever result in a 1-and-1 (for A1)?

JRutledge Tue Dec 11, 2012 01:02am
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP (Post 866141)
I'm stumped. How would a foul against an airborne shooter (A1) ever result in a 1-and-1 (for A1)?
It could in NCAA rules.

Peace

JugglingReferee Tue Dec 11, 2012 03:15am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 866145)
It could in NCAA rules.

Peace
He asked how, not which ruleset is needed. Could you please describe the play's actions so that we all know?

JRutledge Tue Dec 11, 2012 03:28am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 866149)
He asked how, not which ruleset is needed. Could you please describe the play's actions so that we all know?
All I said was in NCAA it was possible. Not sure why that is a bad thing? I was not the one that stated it could happen in NF Rules.

BTW, a airborne shooter that has released the ball, buy rule has not committed a PC foul, but could commit a common foul that would result in a 1 and 1 (Men's Rules).

Now do you feel better? :rolleyes:

Peace

JugglingReferee Tue Dec 11, 2012 04:12am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 866150)
All I said was in NCAA it was possible. Not sure why that is a bad thing? I was not the one that stated it could happen in NF Rules.

BTW, an airborne shooter that has released the ball, by rule has not committed a PC foul, but could commit a common foul that would result in a 1 and 1 (Men's Rules).

Now do you feel better? :rolleyes:

Peace
Thank you for actually answering the question.

bob jenkins Tue Dec 11, 2012 09:17am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 866150)
All I said was in NCAA it was possible. Not sure why that is a bad thing? I was not the one that stated it could happen in NF Rules.

BTW, a airborne shooter that has released the ball, buy rule has not committed a PC foul, but could commit a common foul that would result in a 1 and 1 (Men's Rules).

Now do you feel better? :rolleyes:

Peace
That's a foul BY an airborne shooter. BktBallRef asked about a foul ON (against) an airborne shooter.

HawkeyeCubP Tue Dec 11, 2012 11:28am
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 866181)
That's a foul BY an airborne shooter. BktBallRef asked about a foul ON (against) an airborne shooter.
This is what I was asking. Sorry if I was unclear. (Thanks, Bob.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56am.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1