Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 865435)

It shouldn't and it didn't. In the OP, if I understand correctly, the official refused to allow a sub after the second free throw because there was no sub at the table when he checked after the first.




There is ample time for a sub to report while the ball is at the disposal of the shooter for the second free throw.

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 865435)

It shouldn't and it didn't. In the OP, if I understand correctly, the official refused to allow a sub after the second free throw because there was no sub at the table when he checked after the first.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 865439)

Oh, I see the disconnection now. I was responding to the post which you quoted BillyMac and my citation was to support what he wrote, which was for a more general situation. We agree about the situation in the OP. That substitute met the requirement of the rule which I cited and what BillyMac said.