Throw In Violation
A1’s throw-in hits an official who is on the court. After the ball hits the official, A1 enters the court and screens B2 such that A2 is the first to touch the ball.
Fed ruling? NCAA ruling? (assume that the screen is otherwise legal -- time and distance, not moving unless in the same path and direction, within the frame ...) |
Not sure what the issue is here...seems pretty straight forward legal play unless I'm overlooking something?
|
Although 4.4.4 deals with a live ball already in t/c inbounds, I think it would apply for throw-ins as well.
The thrower cant come get it because it touched an official though. And if I'm envisioning the play correctly, what is the official doing on the court in the first place? :) |
Play on as far as I can tell.
The official is part of the inbound court when it hits him, so the pass becomes a bounce pass of sorts. The ball has been released by the TerI, so A1 can come back inbounds. Still ok. The screen was legal. The only thing I can say is that's it's an unfortunate thing to be hit by the ball while inbounds. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NCAA Rule 9-5.1.f: (The thrower-in shall not) Touch the playing court or touch the ball in the playing court before it has touched another player. Am I mis-reading / mis-interpreting the first part of the NCAA rule? NCAA would have the play be a violation? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It seems to me that either the "Carry" (in e) and "Touch the playing court" (in "f") are redundant or the "Touch the playing court" really is a violation, or the "Carry" means something other than what I think it does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
What if A1 slowly rolls the ball onto the court w/o any pressure? A2 is near the ball as it rolls up the court. A1 now enters the court. This type of action happens all the time. I have never seen a violation called on Team A.
Per your NCAA ruling, is this a violation???? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41am. |