![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
FIBA 2010 Interpretations STATEMENT The purpose of the no-charge semi-circle rule is not to reward a defensive player who has taken a position under his own basket in order to draw a charging foul against an offensive player who is in control of the ball and is penetrating towards the basket. For the no-charge semi-circle rule to be applied: (a) The defensive player shall have both feet inside the semi-circle area (see Diagram 1). The semi-circle line is not part of the semi-circle area. (b) The offensive player shall drive to the basket across the semi-circle line and attempt a shot for a field goal or a pass while airborne. The no-charge semi-circle rule is not to be applied and any contact shall be judged according to normal regulations, e. g. cylinder principle, charge/block principle: (a) For all play situations occurring outside the no-charge semi-circle area, also developing from the area between the semi-circle area and the endline. (b) For all rebounding play situations when, after a shot for a field goal, the ball rebounds and a contact situation occurs. (c) For any illegal use of the hands, arms, legs or body by either offensive or defensive player. You're right in that the rule doesn't mention secondary defenders, but in essence, the rule is all but written with secondary defenders in mind as realistically speaking, that's going to be the only defender that would have both feet entirely in the no charge semi-circle attempting to take a charge.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|