The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 24, 2003, 08:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
2) Fighting is a T and that is contact that could happen during a live ball. If I need to send a message, I'm going to consider it fighting or taunting and call it a T.

Z

Fighting is a flagrant T - make sure you're okay with ejecting the player over this.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 24, 2003, 09:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
2) Fighting is a T and that is contact...
Not necessarily. The act of fighting can occur whether there's contact or not. If a player takes a swing at an opponent and misses, he's fighting and it's a T. If he connects, it's a flagrant personal foul, per the case book.

That's one that Jurassic Referee pounded on me about until I saw the light!

Also, if you consider it fighting and throw the T, you have to toss him as well. All fighting is flagrant. Call the intentional foul, it's the same result.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 25, 2003, 03:46am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
2) Fighting is a T and that is contact...
Not necessarily. The act of fighting can occur whether there's contact or not. If a player takes a swing at an opponent and misses, he's fighting and it's a T. If he connects, it's a flagrant personal foul, per the case book.

Also, if you consider it fighting and throw the T, you have to toss him as well. All fighting is flagrant. Call the intentional foul, it's the same result.
Agree with Tony completely.You could also end up with a major problem if you just called it a normal T,and not a flagrant T,in this case-without a missed swing being involved.Later on in the game,the same player might yap at you or something,and now you haveta lay another T on him.Bang-2nd T-and he's history.The player might also now be looking at some kind of suspension to go along with his ejection,so you might be required to fill out some kinda game report.You do the report,and maybe the player's coach or someone picks out the fact that the first T shoulda actually been a personal foul of some type-by rule.Now everything that you've done goes down the porcelain whirlpool.Not worth it.Do it by the book in the first place and you don't have to worry about any additional problems later.

As Tony said,an intentional foul accomplishes the same purpose as a T in this case anyway. JMO.

[Edited by Jurassic Referee on Jun 25th, 2003 at 03:50 AM]
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 25, 2003, 10:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
Like I said guys, you are completely right. That being said, sometimes in the summer, I run a little tighter ship... especially when a dad is coaching and the sportsmanship is poor. A "T" sends a little stronger message than an intentional because another one is ejection so it can nip it in the bud a little better.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 25, 2003, 11:22am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by zebraman
Like I said guys, you are completely right. That being said, sometimes in the summer, I run a little tighter ship... especially when a dad is coaching and the sportsmanship is poor. A "T" sends a little stronger message than an intentional because another one is ejection so it can nip it in the bud a little better.

Z
Agree with you completely too,Z. Rec leagues are a whole different beast.Sometimes you spend more time trying just to get the kids to play a little bit,than actually refereeing them.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 26, 2003, 02:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Tony,
Your posting the definition of an unsporting foul, made me think about a casebook play I read a while back about a player who is bleeding and intentionally wipes the blood on a player from the opposing team so that this opponent will have to leave the game. Obviously, this action involves contact, but the ruling was that it was an unsporting foul and thus a T. Go figure!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 26, 2003, 07:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Tony,
Your posting the definition of an unsporting foul, made me think about a casebook play I read a while back about a player who is bleeding and intentionally wipes the blood on a player from the opposing team so that this opponent will have to leave the game. Obviously, this action involves contact, but the ruling was that it was an unsporting foul and thus a T. Go figure!
Right -- because it wasn't contact that interfereed with / hindered (I forget the exact wording) the opponent's ability to perform normal offensive or defensive maneuvers -- and that's the definition of a "contact" foul.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1