The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Florida v. Louisville (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/90226-florida-v-louisville.html)

Adam Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:10am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toren (Post 834335)
But he happened to push off on the only play, in my view, where the defender was legal. Is this a good time to penalize?

Is it much different than getting the foul call a second or two later after the offensive player steps OOB or travels?

tref Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 834344)
Is it much different than getting the foul call a second or two later after the offensive player steps OOB or travels?

Right, I believe that's where having a feel for the game comes into play.

If he called the p/c here, Im sure coach wouldve been like, "call the first foul!"

Toren Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 834344)
Is it much different than getting the foul call a second or two later after the offensive player steps OOB or travels?

I think it's different only in the timing. If the defender pushes the offensive player 4 steps ago and then the player goes OOB, that's a little late to penalize.

I think in this play, it was also too late to penalize.

Toren Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 834349)
Right, I believe that's where having a feel for the game comes into play.

If he called the p/c here, Im sure coach wouldve been like, "call the first foul!"

Exactly! and he would have been correct. Which is why I categorized this call as the "safe' call.

tref Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toren (Post 834350)
I think it's different only in the timing. If the defender pushes the offensive player 4 steps ago and then the player goes OOB, that's a little late to penalize.

I think in this play, it was also too late to penalize.

Whats with all the "late" stuff?? See the whole play & adjudicate properly.
Late & right trumps quick & wrong, all day, every day.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toren (Post 834351)
Exactly! and he would have been correct. Which is why I categorized this call as the "safe' call.

Under the circumstances (potential b/c twice) I believe this to be a "correct" call instead of a "safe" call.

Toren Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 834355)
Whats with all the "late" stuff?? See the whole play & adjudicate properly.
Late & right trumps quick & wrong, all day, every day.

I agree, but there is such a thing as too late.



Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 834355)
Under the circumstances (potential b/c twice) I believe this to be a "correct" call instead of a "safe" call.

I don't agree. But I can see the argument.

tref Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toren (Post 834356)
I agree, but there is such a thing as too late.

Example please...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toren (Post 834356)
I don't agree. But I can see the argument.

Place yourself in Hess' shoes, you have a funky misdirection at the timeline... twice. You mean to tell me your mind isnt going to be focused on 2 feet, the ball & the line more than the contact on the offensive guy.

Flirting with the timeline & defensive pressure is always a tough play in real time.

Toren Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:16pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 834364)
Example please....

This play :D



Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 834364)
Place yourself in Hess' shoes, you have a funky misdirection at the timeline... twice. You mean to tell me your mind isnt going to be focused on 2 feet, the ball & the line more than the contact on the offensive guy.

Flirting with the timeline & defensive pressure is always a tough play in real time.

I haven't seen the video since last night, so my memory may be a little foggy. But I remember thinking I would have called the first contact as a hand check. But he obviously ruled it incidental no call. Which then lead to the whole series of backcourt non violations.

For the record, he nailed the no call on the possible violations.

But my point remains, if you let the first couple of contacts go, its hard to justify penalizing the defense on the one play he decides to actually not foul.

tref Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:47pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toren (Post 834367)
I haven't seen the video since last night, so my memory may be a little foggy. But I remember thinking I would have called the first contact as a hand check. But he obviously ruled it incidental no call. Which then lead to the whole series of backcourt non violations.

For the record, he nailed the no call on the possible violations.

But my point remains, if you let the first couple of contacts go, its hard to justify penalizing the defense on the one play he decides to actually not foul.

I guess we'll agree to disagree...

It would be hard to justify if he just blew his whistle like it was a routine call. But did you see his verbal skills & big table presence?

Veteran guys say, we can turn our million dollar call into a cheap call & turn nickle & dimers into a million dollar call, depending on what we do post-whistle.

Take a look at Pitino after the whistle, dude is calling the next play.

Raymond Mon Mar 26, 2012 01:29pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tref (Post 834364)
Example please...



Place yourself in Hess' shoes, you have a funky misdirection at the timeline... twice. You mean to tell me your mind isnt going to be focused on 2 feet, the ball & the line more than the contact on the offensive guy.

Flirting with the timeline & defensive pressure is always a tough play in real time.

Thing is that the first misdirection at the timeline was caused by illegal contact by B1. The next 2 times there is contact it is with A1 warding off a legal B1.

The first contact by B1 is one example of the spotty RSBQ officiating I mentioned in another thread.

tref Mon Mar 26, 2012 01:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef (Post 834385)
Thing is that the first misdirection at the timeline was caused by illegal contact by B1. The next 2 times there is contact it is with A1 warding off a legal B1.

The first contact by B1 is one example of the spotty RSBQ officiating I mentioned in another thread.

Absolutely! Not saying he was correct in missing the first one, but I totally understand how it happened.

Honestly though, the defender with LGP appears to move forward into the dribbler on all 3 instances.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1