The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 08:53pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by sounderref View Post
This is being over-thought and is an easy play. The contact by the offense was marginal, not even close to being enough for a foul. Was the defense vertical...no=foul. If you call a PC on that play you will not be working that level for long.

Side note, notice the L doubling the whistle. This was a routine defensive foul. These are also two of the very best in the tourney, wouldn't be surprised to see the C in the FF (probably an alternate) and the L in a regional semi/final.
Who is advocating a PC on this play? I'm advocating no block on the initial contact and a clear foul for defender's arms not being vertical on the shot. And the 'L' is who took the call to the table.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 09:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Who is advocating a PC on this play? I'm advocating no block on the initial contact and a clear foul for defender's arms not being vertical on the shot. And the 'L' is who took the call to the table.

Oh...it sure sounded like you were advocating that the defender we moving legally.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 09:15pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Oh...it sure sounded like you were advocating that the defender we moving legally.
I was, on the initial contact, because he wasn't moving when the shoulder hit his torso.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 11:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Coast
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
Who is advocating a PC on this play? I'm advocating no block on the initial contact and a clear foul for defender's arms not being vertical on the shot. And the 'L' is who took the call to the table.
Ringo mentions "clear displacement before the contact upstairs", and sniper said he could go PC because of the "shoulder charge". My comments were directed there.

IMO, all of the body contact, both by the offense and defense, is marginal while the lack of verticality by the defenfer's arms is where the fouls occurs.

My 0.02
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Sun Mar 18, 2012, 11:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Agree not even close to PC.

But disagree that this couldn't have been a no-call.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2012, 10:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 671
I've seen less contact called a PC (initial shoulder bump) when the defender falls backward. This defender tries to absorb it.

Agree that this is a foul, I just don't like when offensive players create that much contact (specifically referring to the initial shoulder bump). We all agree we aren't going to call that a charge if the defender stands there and tries to absorb it, but then we are going to give the guy a foul call when his arms aren't entirely vertical?

A no call here would not have bothered me a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2012, 02:42pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballgame99 View Post
I've seen less contact called a PC (initial shoulder bump) when the defender falls backward. This defender tries to absorb it.

Agree that this is a foul, I just don't like when offensive players create that much contact (specifically referring to the initial shoulder bump). We all agree we aren't going to call that a charge if the defender stands there and tries to absorb it, but then we are going to give the guy a foul call when his arms aren't entirely vertical?

A no call here would not have bothered me a bit.
If he had kept his arms vertical (and there never were, even before the bump) I would not have a foul for him stepping into A1 when he actually shot.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2012, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 622
Thanks for discussing. IMO it just seems like offensive player moved defensive player quite a bit. I felt like defensive player was there, granted arms were not vertical... Again thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2012, 10:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Ringo View Post
Thanks for discussing. IMO it just seems like offensive player moved defensive player quite a bit. I felt like defensive player was there, granted arms were not vertical... Again thanks!
I agree, looking back, the first move by the offensive player causes the defender to jump back into the semi-circle. Defender then jumps back into original spot.

When offensive player shoots, defender is not at all straight up, but I think offense causes some of this contact - which is why I think unless you are calling it super-tight because the tempo of the game needs it, you can call this a draw and no-call it.
__________________
HOMER: Just gimme my gun.
CLERK: Hold on, the law requires a five-day waiting period; we've got run a background check...
HOMER: Five days???? But I'm mad NOW!!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 19, 2012, 10:58pm
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by canuckrefguy View Post
i agree, looking back, the first move by the offensive player causes the defender to jump back into the semi-circle. Defender then jumps back into original spot.

When offensive player shoots, defender is not at all straight up, but i think offense causes some of this contact - which is why i think unless you are calling it super-tight because the tempo of the game needs it, you can call this a draw and no-call it.
+1
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/89949-murray-state-v-marquette.html
Posted By For Type Date
The Racer Nation • View topic - Interesting topic This thread Refback Mon Mar 19, 2012 09:54pm

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Colorado State v. Murray State Video Thread APG Basketball 5 Sat Mar 17, 2012 06:33pm
Tenn St/Murray St JetMetFan Basketball 67 Tue Mar 06, 2012 11:14am
Murray State vs. Butler - Player Control CDurham Basketball 11 Sun Mar 21, 2010 03:55pm
Murray State/Vanderbilt play bas2456 Basketball 6 Fri Mar 19, 2010 01:35am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1