I can think of no other interpretation for "we have to be mindful of who we are calling it against".
JRutledge
Sun Mar 04, 2012 04:09pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffman
(Post 829676)
I can think of no other interpretation for "we have to be mindful of who we are calling it against".
Yes there is. You can know who you are calling a foul on and not give anyone a break. Heck I watch all the time who is guarding the best players and what they are doing to stop them. This happen to us on Friday where it was clear the opponent was holding, grabbing and being physical to prevent the best player from getting the ball in the post. This is why I do not trust news paper quotes that were not elaborated on as the final conclusion.
Peace
Adam
Sun Mar 04, 2012 04:15pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffman
(Post 829676)
I can think of no other interpretation for "we have to be mindful of who we are calling it against".
Maybe in a few more years, you will. ;)
tomegun
Sun Mar 04, 2012 09:01pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
(Post 829661)
Well, you've given no information as to what the official(s) did on the play so all I can say is that it sounds like something I've heard coaches say before.
Sorry about that. The official told a coach, "I didn't call it on _____ because that would have been his fourth foul." He said this to the player's coach in the second half. Because the coach was on the other end of the court he said it loud enough that the other coach could have easily heard it. I hope that makes more sense.
Raymond
Sun Mar 04, 2012 09:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomegun
(Post 829733)
Sorry about that. The official told a coach, "I didn't call it on _____ because that would have been his fourth foul." He said this to the player's coach in the second half. Because the coach was on the other end of the court he said it loud enough that the other coach could have easily heard it. I hope that makes more sense.
