The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Feb 09, 2012, 11:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 184
Maybe I shouldn't play...

I don't play a ton of basketball and I'm not particularly athletic, so my friends and I put together a team to play in the intramural league (NFHS rules, or so they tell me) at our university. I'm a pretty even-keeled person. I don't get frustrated easily, which is why officiating suits me well. I do often get frustrated when I'm playing sports, though. So when the other team got their third or fourth breakaway in the first eight minutes of our game today, I was a bit frustrated and gave the kid a solid push to the back to prevent the basket. I fully expected the official to come up with an intentional foul, but instead they decided to call a technical foul. Technical fouls in this league require us to play a man down for two minutes. Not only that, but they gave two free throws for the shooting foul plus two more free throws for the technical foul. Then they awarded the ball to our opponents on the baseline where the foul was committed rather than the division line. Yeah, I know they're recreational officials getting paid minimum wage and I probably shouldn't expect anything different, but if I had known that they were going to call a technical foul for live-ball contact, I would never have done it. Oh well. Maybe I should just stick to officiating.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
From what you described I might be going flagrant and tossing you for shoving a player in the back.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:28am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
From what you described I might be going flagrant and tossing you for shoving a player in the back.
Really? Sounded like one of the usual circumstances one calls an INT/FF1 for...a breakaway lay-up where the defender pushes the opponent in the back and causes excessive contact.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:32am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
Really? Sounded like one of the usual circumstances one calls an INT/FF1 for...a breakaway lay-up where the defender pushes the opponent in the back and causes excessive contact.
Yep, but pulling this stunt in an intramural game is just inviting disaster. They may have been instructed to call it that way to cut down on fights.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 02:52am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Yep, but pulling this stunt in an intramural game is just inviting disaster. They may have been instructed to call it that way to cut down on fights.
Well I can't comment on how the officials handled the play as I don't know all their rules. It's obvious they don't follow pure NFHS rules. I was just commenting on the play itself. There was nothing in the play, that indicated to me, that it needed to be upgraded to a flagrant/FF2.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer View Post
Well I can't comment on how the officials handled the play as I don't know all their rules. It's obvious they don't follow pure NFHS rules. I was just commenting on the play itself. There was nothing in the play, that indicated to me, that it needed to be upgraded to a flagrant/FF2.
What's a FF2?

Player on a breakaway gets shoved in the back could very well, and easily, be excessive. We don't need a punch or an elbow to qualify a flagrant foul.
__________________
in OS I trust
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 03:28am
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by deecee View Post
What's a FF2?

Player on a breakaway gets shoved in the back could very well, and easily, be excessive. We don't need a punch or an elbow to qualify a flagrant foul.
Flagrant foul 2 (more accurately flagrant 2 personal foul)...NCAA equivalent/terminology that equals NFHS' flagrant foul. And by virtue of saying it was excessive contact means it's intentional. Now you're right that a play like this, in general, could be flagrant but nothing in the OP suggested that IMO.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 04:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 184
They certainly wouldn't have been wrong to toss me given the level of play. Definitely wouldn't have been flagrant in a competitive NFHS game, though. Simply intentional. Admittedly, it was embarrassing for me. Still upset that I let my frustrations get the best of me. It was just the administration following the incident that bothered me more than anything.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 09:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
I kinda like the power play idea for IM...
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Yep, but pulling this stunt in an intramural game is just inviting disaster. They may have been instructed to call it that way to cut down on fights.
this will be my second year doing intramurals, its amazing how quickly things escalate between teams who really have nothing to play for. The league is free and the prize for winning is a tshirt. :/ I agree with the flagrant here. Get the trouble maker out of the building.

I had a ball thrown at my head this year after calling a technical, its crazy how seriously some of these guys (and gals) take it
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Public Address announcer/ Play by play Terrapins Fan Basketball 34 Sun Dec 13, 2009 12:20pm
Force play or time play? Rita C Baseball 44 Sat Dec 05, 2009 10:12am
Force play or tag play dsbrooks1014 Baseball 3 Tue Apr 21, 2009 09:09pm
Play-by-Play Commentary FC IC Basketball 2 Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am
CBS play-by-play announcers: should they all be fired? David Clausi Basketball 6 Mon Mar 27, 2000 11:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1