|
|||
When...
Partner and I are debating. When a dribbler loses control and the ball bounces high, he puts his hand under it but does not dribble it again... I say no violation.
Right or wrong?
__________________
Refsmitty |
|
|||
If he does not dribble again, what's the violation?
__________________
You learn something new everyday ... |
|
|||
We're debating it because we can't find reference to the fact that it is not a violation in the books.
We also know that it takes a slow whistle not to call it right away - something we are both working on.
__________________
Refsmitty |
|
|||
If It Looks Like a Duck . . .
Agree or Disagree: This, and related "high dribble" situations, is often whistled (with one toot; two or three or more toots by those pushing the envelope) on the premise that "it just doesn't look good". No violation involved, but if it looks bad, it must be illegal.
__________________
Making Every Effort to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, Looking at the Right Thing to Make the Right Call |
|
|||
So again, what violation does your partner think it is based on the rules you can find?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
That was my question ... your partner blows the whistle, what's the call (violation) he signals?
__________________
You learn something new everyday ... |
|
|||
So what you're saying is that your partner thinks it is a violation but has no idea why?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|