The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 28, 2003, 08:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Re: Re: Chuck, Chuck, Chuck.

Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
I cannot even believe you are debating this.
Jeff, you haven't given him any material, and he's GOT to argue with someone!!
Juules, it all has to do with this inferiority complex Chuck has about being short. I mean you're a balding, middle-aged man and you seemed to have come to terms with it. Can you help Chuck out?
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 28, 2003, 09:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,217
Cameron
You have convinced me. I have never seen this explained so well, or maybe I just never read all the arguments correctly. I now see this as an immediate T, no warning required.

It is a violation of the throw-in provision to touch the ball on the OOB side of the boundary plane in every rule that explicitly deals with this issue. The one thing that always got me was the defender being allowed to penetrate the plane after the throw. I now UNDERSTAND. This new freedom granted to the defender is not intended to allow the defender to touch the ball. Rather, it is an acknowledgement that the defender cannot possibly affect the throw-in by reaching through the plane after the ball is released. The defender does affect the throw in by reaching through before release. Advantage/disadv concept says you should call nothing for a mere boundary plane violation after the ball is released, and you must warn and then T if it happens before release.

So what is the penalty [for touching the ball on the wrong side of the plane]? Again, the ball is not really "in play" until it crosses the boundary plane. If an offensive player touches the ball, the offense loses the ball. If the defense touches it, they are delaying the game, because they are intentionally touching the ball on a throw-in before it is legal to touch it. Granting another throw-in is not an adequate remedy in this case - A gains nothing from B's violation. T them up in my book.

[Edited by Hawks Coach on Apr 28th, 2003 at 09:55 PM]
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2003, 06:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Re: Chuck, Chuck, Chuck.

Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
The rule states clearly that all restrictions end when the ball is released.
Uh, which rule is that, exactly? If it were that obvious, we wouldn't have four pages on this topic -- again. Care to give me a rule citation?

Didn't think so. . .
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2003, 06:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Re: Re: Chuck, Chuck, Chuck.

Quote:
Originally posted by Chuck
If I had to guess, the reason for allowing him to cross the plane is so that if his momentum carries him across the line after the release of the ball, the official is not required to interrupt the play to issue a warning.

Originally posted by Camron Rust
The reason that breaking the plan is permitted after the release is that any possible infraction will not matter since the thrower has released the ball.
Camron, thanks for explaining it better than I could. Slowly, but surely, we are making converts.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2003, 08:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Re: Re: Re: Chuck, Chuck, Chuck.

Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Juules, it all has to do with this inferiority complex Chuck has about being short. I mean you're a balding, middle-aged man and you seemed to have come to terms with it. Can you help Chuck out?
After mick comes to terms with his weird dreams about lack of authority, I'll have an empty slot. This time of year, the whole field of Whistle Psychology gets really crowded!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1