View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 13, 2000, 01:02pm
hoopsrefBC hoopsrefBC is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 176
Post

quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson:
I skimmed them, and they seem to go both ways. It is a good base of definition, but I these ruling are too "tough". My guess is if you call an intentional foul on a post move, you'll get run. And counting the time contact is made( 2 seconds)? Again, good theory, but if there is no AD/DisAd why call it? I don't think you can put a time limit on when a disadvantage occurs from contact.


If the article is says that officals should stop using the ad/disad concept. And that officials shouldn't judge if any ad or disad occured. They should just call the foul.(top of page 5=+) and this comming from the head of the National coordinator of Women's basketball officiating.(NCAA)
I'm playing the devil, just thought this would be a good topic.
keep smiling
SH

Reply With Quote