Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
...how many times have we told you not to answer rules based questions!
This is not a correctable error situation. The only FT that was shot was merited. This is an official's error. The official's error clearly put one team at a disadvantage (players stood motionless and didn't attempt to rebound). Play should be blown dead immediately and resumed using the alternating-possession procedure.
Please, please don't answer rules questions. You're clueless!!
|
Yes this is a correctable error situation. They awarded the wrong kind of FT. The players were told that it was two instead of 1 and 1. The players reacted based on wrong information. If the information was given properly, then it would not have mattered. This could not be in my eyes any kind of AP, because the information was given incorrectly by the officials. This clearly was noticed before a dead ball and should be corrected under the correctable error situation. This would only be an AP situation if the officials told them it was a 1 and 1 and the players reacted the way they did. I think you need to go back and read the entire situation or show a casebook reference that specifically addresses this sitaution. But of course you cannot so whatelse should I expect.
This cannot be an AP situation with the officials screwing this up and giving improper information. No casebook support for your application that I see.
Peace
|
Did you miss my post? It is NOT one of the five correctible errors,and the play IS covered explicitly in the casebook under 8.6.1(b)!!!
Sun Feb 16, 2003, 06:12pm
Hybrid Mode
