![]() |
|
|||
Women's college game. We discover a girl with a tongue stud in her mouth. We tell her to remove it and proceed with the game. In the 2nd half we discover a DIFFERENT girl with a tongue stud (same team) we now administer a technical foul.
Did we do this right??? |
|
|||
Quote:
Chuck
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
~Hodges My two sense! ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I agree with Chuck, with one expansion.
You must first determine that it is an unsproting act, or making a travisty of the game in order to assess a technical. With the information I have here, I think I'd have passed. You do not, however allow her to participate until the stud is removed. Blachawk |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Jurassic ~
I'm not disagreeing. My point was that it is one heck of a stretch to call it an unsporting act, or making a travisity of the game. Any act that is determined to cross those lines, however, should be handled accordingly. If there is some circumstatce that we are not aware of here, that would put this in that catagory (although I don't know what it would be), it would have to be handled. Again, I think Rocky and Chunck have it right in this example. Just offering a little food for thought. Blackhawk |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|