![]() |
Women's college game. We discover a girl with a tongue stud in her mouth. We tell her to remove it and proceed with the game. In the 2nd half we discover a DIFFERENT girl with a tongue stud (same team) we now administer a technical foul.
Did we do this right??? |
Did everyone on the team (coach) know that you told the first girl to take it out?
|
Quote:
Chuck |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I agree with Chuck, with one expansion.
You must first determine that it is an unsproting act, or making a travisty of the game in order to assess a technical. With the information I have here, I think I'd have passed. You do not, however allow her to participate until the stud is removed. Blachawk |
Quote:
|
Jurassic ~
I'm not disagreeing. My point was that it is one heck of a stretch to call it an unsporting act, or making a travisity of the game. Any act that is determined to cross those lines, however, should be handled accordingly. If there is some circumstatce that we are not aware of here, that would put this in that catagory (although I don't know what it would be), it would have to be handled. Again, I think Rocky and Chunck have it right in this example. Just offering a little food for thought. Blackhawk |
unsporting travesty
For example, I would think you could call the T if the same woman kept coming back onto the court with the stud in her tongue; forcing you to stop the game and send her to the bench.
snaqwells |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25pm. |