Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by pizanno
But, I'd respectfully have to disagree with Chuck that it's just as flagrant as a fist. If we see a fist, I think it's an automatic, even if there's no contact.
If he doesn't make contact on this play, then violation, yes?
|
Yes. But on this play, the elbow was the same as a fist. This particular play was flagrant, IMO. That was my only point. I was not trying to say that any elbow -- with or without contact -- is flagrant. I was merely commenting on this one sitch.
Chuck
|
Yeah..i see your point. Elbow, fist, or even foot, can be considered an intent to injure. Err on the side of safety and he'll never (?) do it again.
..okay, I change my mind again!
Thu Feb 06, 2003, 04:33pm
Hybrid Mode
