|
Mon Jan 20, 2003, 10:43pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds like there are 2 keys to this play which have been posted above.
1. Airborne shooter or not: from the original it seems not. 2. Intial legal guarding position: really doesn't say in original post. If B had already establish a legal guarding position then B could move to maintain the position: PC foul A If B had not establish a legal guarding position B would have to have both feet on the ground in front of A to be there legally:Blocking B 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
