Just wondering

[just another ref]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by JRutledge
[B]just another ref,

The problem I see with that statement, suggest that there is never a time defender can touch a dribbler.
__________________________________________________ _________

Which statement was that?
__________________________________________________ _________


The reality is that is not completely true. If a defender is retreating and the touching was kind of a protection from getting ran over, I do not think I will call a handcheck on a defender.
__________________________________________________ ________

Depends on the touch. You could be retreating and protect yourself with a "Chuck Norris Touch" of some kind.
__________________________________________________ _________

Even when we talk about legal guarding position, the rules allow the defender to put their hands up and arms up to protect themselves as long as they are within their vertical plane.
__________________________________________________ __________

Absolutely true, but what does that have to do with what we were talking about.
__________________________________________________ __________

In my opinion and what I have been taught for several years, call handchecking when the defender directed the dribbler, not just when they touch them.
__________________________________________________ __________

Would that be the same as displacement? I believe that is the term you used earlier.
__________________________________________________ __________
Especially on a retreating defender you do not want to call handchecking when they are not coming out to defend a play.
__________________________________________________ __________

I'm a little vague on this one, but the retreating defender can often be be guilty of a hand check foul as he tries to recover an original position in front of a dribbler.
__________________________________________________ __________

If they are getting beat and the contact did not affect that, leave it alone.
__________________________________________________ __________

Fair enough.
__________________________________________________ __________
See the problem is that NF is trying to cover several states, several skill levels and several styles of basketball.
__________________________________________________ __________

I don't really consider this a problem. This is where that word JUDGMENT comes in. I think we all agree on that. What I do consider a problem is the higher skill levels taking liberties with the rules. This started in the NBA.
It is now solidly entrenched in the college game, and is making strides every year in high school, and even below, in my opinion.
__________________________________________________ __________


And if you were to work in some of the bigger Christmas Tournaments around here and call a touch as handchecking, you would not be back.
__________________________________________________ __________

Right now, this is the least of my worries. They wouldn't hire me anyhow, I wear a belt.
__________________________________________________ __________

And even tagging or a touch on a stationary player in many circles is allowed once, keep doing it is is a foul.
__________________________________________________ __________

I'm lost again. What circles are you referring to now?
__________________________________________________ __________
But I personally have been talking players out of this action without having to call a foul. Especially early when it appears they want to use their hands to try to measure their opponent with their hands without touching them.
__________________________________________________ __________

Off the ball, as mick said, a warning is okay, even though it is not something I do a lot of myself. But what about on the ball? Do you talk to them, too? And why would they be talked out of it so easily if they know you at all. You already said it is not a foul without displacement.
__________________________________________________ __________