The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 10, 2000, 09:12pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Post

quote:
Originally posted by Brian Watson:

What does Mr. T think???[/B]


First of all, I love my new title.

As to when how to determine whether an act was "flagrant" or not, I'm going to use half a cop-out and say that part of it is just having a lot of experience and seeing a lot of bad behavior over the years. The more games you work, the more you have a feel for judging an act within the context of the season, game, league, level, etc. I don't think there's a clear-cut answer.

Now, having said that, the other half of the answer is that if you feel the act was intended to injure, or could, under normal circumstances cause injury, you have a pretty good reason to call it flagrant. How do you know what a player's intent is? Again, it comes with experience.

Of course, some acts are so obviously intended to injure that even a coach could figure it out. Throwing a ball - hard - at the back of an opponents head is so obvious that I bet even a giblet-head like Billy Packer could get this call right.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 10, 2000, 09:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Smile

quote:
Originally posted by Mark Padgett:
Throwing a ball - hard - at the back of an opponents head is so obvious that I bet even a giblet-head like Billy Packer could get this call right.


Methinks that Billy Packer would say something like "that's a travel!"
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 10, 2000, 11:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24
Talking

MOFFICIAL: Whenever there is a jump ball situation, you, and possibly even your partner, should blow your whistle, signal jump ball, and simultaneously, run towards the players involved and stand over them (if they are on the floor).

Talk to the players and remain at the spot until they have separated away from each other. If they are tustling for the ball, take it away from them.

At least one official should remain in a position to watch the other players for a possible dead ball foul.

This has helped me in the past on numerous occasions. You'd be surprised what your presence near the players does in situations such as these. GOOD LUCK!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 11, 2000, 01:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 179
Wink

Doghead, No chip here, just stating my opinion. Meant no disrespect to anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 11, 2000, 04:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 64
Post

bsilliman quote:
"Also, we do have big egos as officials and like to think that we are the best. When you stop doing so, then maybe it is time to take up another profession".

bsilliman...I don't mean to over-analyze your commentary however, I'm a first year official. So you're telling me that I need to develop a big ego in order to be an competent official, otherwise I need to think about doing something else with my time? Just wondering?

Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 26, 2000, 04:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1
Post

I have a situation that i was in recently involving throwing elbows. my partner ejected this player. is this considered flagrant or should that have been assessed as a technical.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 26, 2000, 04:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 306
Post

quote:
Originally posted by bigman137:
I have a situation that i was in recently involving throwing elbows. my partner ejected this player. is this considered flagrant or should that have been assessed as a technical.


Rule 10 Section 3 Article 8(g) "A player shall not swing his/her arm(s) or elbow(s) even though there is no contact with an opponent". Penalty is a technical foul; 2 free throws and the ball. If there is contact, same rule Article 9 addresses the ball being dead, "A player shall not intentionally or flagrantly contact an opponent when the ball is dead and such contact is not a personal foul." Rule 4 Section 19 Article 4 addresses flagrant fouls. A flagrant foul may be a personal or technical of a violent or savage nature, or a technical noncontact foul which displays unacceptable conduct. If personal, it involves violent contact such as striking, kicking, kneeing, etc. If technical, it involves dead ball contact or non-contact at any time which is extreme or persistent, vulgar or abusive conduct. Fighting is a flagrant foul."

That being said, it is a judgment call as to the severity of the contact that determines the penalty. If in the official's judgment the contact is severe enough, it's flagrant and the player's gone, 2 shots and the ball. If no contact and the elbow is swung excessively, technical. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1