Do Over

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by mbyron

It's just a warning. Blue should have the ball anyway, not because of a DOG "violation."

Actually it's both a violation for breaking the plane during the throw-in and a DOG warning.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Actually it's both a violation for breaking the plane during the throw-in and a DOG warning.

Yep, which becomes highly relevant if it's an AP throw-in.

[stir22]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Yep, which becomes highly relevant if it's an AP throw-in.

would you explain this a little more?

thank you.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by stir22

would you explain this a little more?

thank you.

If the defending team has a DOG warning, and it was an AP throw-in, then the new throw-in is due to the warning and the arrow does not change.

[stir22]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

If the defending team has a DOG warning, and it was an AP throw-in, then the new throw-in is due to the warning and the arrow does not change.

gotcha. many thanks.