Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 735356)

After seeing the replay on CBS College Sports, the officiating crew was right in assessing the T.

The clock did happen to stop at 0.3, however without the ball being out into play except by the "Yell King" the clock did restart without Pitt inbounding.

The time should not of ticked off so there was a delay of game due to the game not being yet over.

Originally Posted by chseagle (Post 735356)

After seeing the replay on CBS College Sports, the officiating crew was right in assessing the T.

The clock did happen to stop at 0.3, however without the ball being out into play except by the "Yell King" the clock did restart without Pitt inbounding.

The time should not of ticked off so there was a delay of game due to the game not being yet over.

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 735433)

But, if the clock started in error, then the officials would have stopped play to re-set the clock. So, the cheerleader's actions did not affect (delay) the game.

Originally Posted by Eastshire (Post 735434)

But did the cheerleader's mistake induce the timing error? If the officials thought so then the cheerleader did cause the game to be delayed.