The Official Forum
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Nova / Syracuse rescinded intentional (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/63034-nova-syracuse-rescinded-intentional.html)

Adam Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:46pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap (Post 732961)
Am I going to have to give you a list of people not to quote?:mad:
I wondered about that, so I went back and cut most of his post out. You'll have to read JR's post to get the real drivel.

26 Year Gap Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:00pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 732975)
I wondered about that, so I went back and cut most of his post out. You'll have to read JR's post to get the real drivel.
Thanks. You're a real pal. Send me a pm so I can return the favor some day.:cool:

Rich Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:09pm
[QUOTE=TheOracle;732949]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 732939)
Naw, that's not in dispute at all. If you look at the video that mbyron linked, you'll see the L signal an intentional foul.
QUOTE]

There is no debate. He made a preliminary signal on a double-whistle that was not his call. It was not an intentional foul. The L had no chance to see the play up top because of the backboard, which is exactly why it was not his call. The C explained that to him, told him there was no way it was an intentional foul, and the L smartly and correctly deferred to the C. The crew did the right thing, and nobody will be penalized for it at all. End of story.
Bullspit. It was certainly intentional and excessive contact to boot.

upprdeck Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:09pm
of course the head of the BE officials also ruled today the correct call should have been excessive use of force 2 shots and the ball..

Rich Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by upprdeck (Post 732996)
of course the head of the BE officials also ruled today the correct call should have been excessive use of force 2 shots and the ball..
In other words, an intentional foul. QED.

26 Year Gap Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:14pm
[QUOTE=RichMSN;732995]
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOracle (Post 732949)

Bullspit. It was certainly intentional and excessive contact to boot.
We can debate this all day long. [I agree with you, Rich]. But, what happens in the woodshed, stays in the woodshed.

Adam Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:17pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap (Post 732985)
Thanks. You're a real pal. Send me a pm so I can return the favor some day.:cool:
Quit whining and enjoy your weather.

Adam Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by upprdeck (Post 732996)
of course the head of the BE officials also ruled today the correct call should have been excessive use of force 2 shots and the ball..
Excessive use of force? Isn't that supposed to cost him his badge?

Welpe Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:27pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 733004)
Excessive use of force? Isn't that supposed to cost him his badge?
Two weeks without pay while the tough yet sympathetic watch commander requests his gun and badge.

TheOracle Tue Feb 22, 2011 01:59pm
[QUOTE=Jurassic Referee;732963]It's not the L's call on a fast break shot? Gee, you learn something new every day.

I guess you really don't know much. On a fast break, the L takes his side, and the C takes the other. Glad I'm able to teach you something.

jbduke Tue Feb 22, 2011 02:07pm
[QUOTE=TheOracle;733022]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 732963)
It's not the L's call on a fast break shot? Gee, you learn something new every day.

I guess you really don't know much. On a fast break, the L takes his side, and the C takes the other. Glad I'm able to teach you something.
You don't work much men's college, do you? If you do, you'd better study up quick before you're found out.

Adam Tue Feb 22, 2011 02:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbduke (Post 733027)
You don't work much men's college, do you? If you do, you'd better study up quick before you're found out.
Are you talking to JR or TheOracle?

Rich Tue Feb 22, 2011 02:10pm
[QUOTE=TheOracle;733022]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee (Post 732963)
It's not the L's call on a fast break shot? Gee, you learn something new every day.

I guess you really don't know much. On a fast break, the L takes his side, and the C takes the other. Glad I'm able to teach you something.
Glad we're all able to see you're a freaking clown.

For everyone else - is this OldSchool reincarnated?

Adam Tue Feb 22, 2011 02:11pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOracle (Post 733022)
blah blah blah blah

And for crying out loud, can you please learn how to quote someone? Here's a hint: Just hit the quote button and don't try deleting stuff.

APG Tue Feb 22, 2011 02:13pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOracle (Post 733022)

I guess you really don't know much. On a fast break, the L takes his side, and the C takes the other. Glad I'm able to teach you something.
The contact occurred just about at the middle of the lane. It's not realistic to expect the lead to not have a whistle on this type of play with such contact. I'd contend that the lead had an excellent view of the play, and that the backboard didn't impair his view of play at all. I'd even say that the initial intentional foul call was correct due to excessive contact. And it seems as if the Big East supervisors agree it was an intentional foul (well at least to one poster...still looking for an article to confirm this).


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44am.
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1