Fight rule - The Official Forum

#7 (permalink)

Thu Feb 17, 2011, 09:04am

JugglingReferee JugglingReferee is offline

Fav theme: Roundball Rock

Join Date: Nov 2000

Location: Near Dog River (sorta)

Posts: 8,558

Case (e) implies that simultaneous refers to the substitutes coming off of bench.

So then this demands that simultaneous in (d) could only apply to a corresponding substitute player.

It can then be inferred that a fight on-court and substitutes leaving their bench are not deemed to be simultaneous.

So if my first statement is correct, then Nevada was correct.

Just my 2 cents.

__________________
Pope Francis

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fight! Fight!	lrpalmer3	Basketball	18	Wed Jun 13, 2007 08:24pm
Cat Fight!	LarryS	Basketball	29	Fri Jan 26, 2007 06:19pm
fight	ChrisSportsFan	Basketball	8	Tue Feb 15, 2005 09:37am
Nearly a Fight!	JeffRef	Basketball	36	Wed Jul 18, 2001 09:16am
Fight Situation - NCAA rule	hoopsrefBC	Basketball	9	Tue Dec 19, 2000 03:21am

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28am.