The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   GV 2 Whistle, ACLU Stepping in (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/62502-gv-2-whistle-aclu-stepping.html)

Eastshire Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 730356)
Ah, now you're defining it in a way that's meaningful (and therefore debatable), and where I thought you were heading. The vast majority of scholastic athletic budges of which I'm aware are indeed general-budget-funded and therefore, in your definition, not self-supporting.

I'm willing to bet this is the case with most colleges as well. Athletic budgets will necessarily drain funds from the general budget that would be used for other things.

I'll take this bet (and win running away). At the collegiate level, football is a money-maker that pays for all the other athletics.

There a significant difference between scholastic athletic budgets (which I agree are not for the most part self-supporting) and most amateur athletic budgets of which scholastic athletics are a significant part but also include the innumerable baseball, basketball, soccer, football, etc leagues that exist.

Quote:

1. I missed the question mark on what was grammatically written as a statement. Fair enough.
It's a nasty habit that I need to get rid of when writing on forums.

rockyroad Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 730344)
Very few amateur athletic programs anywhere are self-supporting by any meaningful definition of the word.

Been to a high school football game in Texas or Florida lately...they are absolutely self-supporting. May not be the norm, but they generate a LOT of money.

26 Year Gap Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 730365)
Been to a high school football game in Texas or Florida lately...they are absolutely self-supporting. May not be the norm, but they generate a LOT of money.

This is why Football was not included in the reduction of games recommended and nearly imposed by the FHSAA until a girl's parent got involved. I don't think boys basketball is self-supporting, either, based on the attendance I have seen at most games. At least here, when soccer of both genders, basketball of both genders and other events seem to be scheduled on the same nights.

Adam Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:33pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eastshire (Post 730364)
I'll take this bet (and win running away). At the collegiate level, football is a money-maker that pays for all the other athletics.

I think the idea that more than half of the colleges in the country earn enough money from their 2 major men's sports to support the entire athletic budget is a fallacy. Even assuming the top 20 teams can do that (which I don't assume), that's not even close to 50% of Division 1 colleges. Add to that the large number of Division 2, 3, and NAIA schools, and you're going to lose this bet with force before you limp away.

Unless you think schools like Iowa State, Northwestern, Colorado State, New Mexico, etc., are somehow able to keep their athletic programs self-sustaining, you're going to lose the bet even if we keep it to the FBS schools.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eastshire (Post 730364)
There a significant difference between scholastic athletic budgets (which I agree are not for the most part self-supporting) and most amateur athletic budgets of which scholastic athletics are a significant part but also include the innumerable baseball, basketball, soccer, football, etc leagues that exist.

For the record, I'm not suggesting any of these football programs aren't self-sustaining at the D1 level. They may well be, but to suggest that the football and basketball revenue at Iowa State is able to support the expenditures of all sports is incorrect at best.

Adam Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:34pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockyroad (Post 730365)
Been to a high school football game in Texas or Florida lately...they are absolutely self-supporting. May not be the norm, but they generate a LOT of money.

The football teams can probably support the football teams in those states, but I doubt they're able to support the rest of the sports at these schools as well.

JugglingReferee Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:48pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 730376)
The football teams can probably support the football teams in those states, but I doubt they're able to support the rest of the sports at these schools as well.

My younger brother played HS football and had a trip to Masillon, OH. There he learned that the football team was essentially the student council. Because of the money they brought in, they had a large voice in how money was dispersed - by helping purchase uniforms, etc, for other sports.

Eastshire Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 730375)
I think the idea that more than half of the colleges in the country earn enough money from their 2 major men's sports to support the entire athletic budget is a fallacy. Even assuming the top 20 teams can do that (which I don't assume), that's not even close to 50% of Division 1 colleges. Add to that the large number of Division 2, 3, and NAIA schools, and you're going to lose this bet with force before you limp away.

Unless you think schools like Iowa State, Northwestern, Colorado State, New Mexico, etc., are somehow able to keep their athletic programs self-sustaining, you're going to lose the bet even if we keep it to the FBS schools.



For the record, I'm not suggesting any of these football programs aren't self-sustaining at the D1 level. They may well be, but to suggest that the football and basketball revenue at Iowa State is able to support the expenditures of all sports is incorrect at best.

Now, I'm just dying to know. Does anyone have any idea of how to track this down?

26 Year Gap Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eastshire (Post 730383)
Now, I'm just dying to know. Does anyone have any idea of how to track this down?

Maybe there is a stat guy or table guy or something...

APG Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eastshire (Post 730383)
Now, I'm just dying to know. Does anyone have any idea of how to track this down?

Are you looking for football programs in FBS? Or Athletic departments in general?

Adam Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 730382)
My younger brother played HS football and had a trip to Masillon, OH. There he learned that the football team was essentially the student council. Because of the money they brought in, they had a large voice in how money was dispersed - by helping purchase uniforms, etc, for other sports.

Again, I'm not saying there aren't exceptions. But even this statement, "by helping purchase..." assumes funds were coming from elsewhere and the football revenue was a help.

Eastshire Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer (Post 730387)
Are you looking for football programs in FBS? Or Athletic departments in general?

We'd need to see the Statement of Activities for the whole athletic department with enough breakdown in the revenue section to be sure whether there are any transfers from the school's general budget.

Eastshire Tue Feb 15, 2011 02:58pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 730388)
Again, I'm not saying there aren't exceptions. But even this statement, "by helping purchase..." assumes funds were coming from elsewhere and the football revenue was a help.

I'd go so far to say the exception at the high school level would be self-supporting departments.

APG Tue Feb 15, 2011 03:03pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eastshire (Post 730391)
We'd need to see the Statement of Activities for the whole athletic department with enough breakdown in the revenue section to be sure whether there are any transfers from the school's general budget.

This site can be used to find the budgets and breakdown of most colleges. Data is disclosed by virtue of the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act.

Equity in Athletics Data Analysis Cutting Tool

Eastshire Tue Feb 15, 2011 03:23pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer (Post 730395)
This site can be used to find the budgets and breakdown of most colleges. Data is disclosed by virtue of the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act.

Equity in Athletics Data Analysis Cutting Tool

Thanks, unfortunately, this report is not in enough detail to determine the level of "institutional support" as they put it as there's one line for revenue "Not Allocated by Gender/Sport" which would include this item if it exists.

Interestingly though, the University of Iowa ran a "profit" in it's athletic department of $14.3 million for the 09-10 year. The men's teams ran at a $26.9 million profit and the women's teams ran at a $10.3 million loss (not counting indirect expenses). The football team brought in $45.85 million in revenue out of $58 million total allocated revenue. There was also $30.5 million non-allocated revenue.

I'd say my side of the bet is looking good, but this is in no way determinative.

KCRC Tue Feb 15, 2011 03:27pm

This USA Today article from 2008 quotes a study suggesting that only 19 of 119 FBS athletic departments broke even or made money. In addition, only 67 of the 119 FBS schools even broke even on football, let alone having the football team subsidize the rest of the athletic department. I'm going to guess that most, if not all, FCS, DII, DIII and NAIA athletic departments draw funds from their schools general budget.

Few athletics programs in black; most need aid - USATODAY.com

Snaqs is right about Iowa State. Because of the state of Iowa's general budget crisis, the Iowa Board of Regents has instructed all three state schools to eliminate general budget expenditures for athletics. U of Iowa achieved the feat in 2007, Iowa State is getting very close, but Northern Iowa doesn't have a realistic chance.

Regents approve modest funding cut to UNI athletics | Des Moines Register Staff Blogs


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1