No.

Good Memory Welpe
 

As I recall, at our last Forum Member's Meeting, we re-validated Rule 7, Section 3, Paragraph 2, Subsection 9.a. "Only an actual Official may nominate a post to be "post of the day" on the Offical Forum.

This rule prevents such an action. Good catch!

For you newbies/rookies, this is why book knowledge and a good memory are so important in our avocation!

Robert's Rules Of Order ???
 

Did you have a quorum of esteemed members?

That is not in the IAABO manual. ;)

I did not automatically nominate the post however, I asked if it could be nominated, so there is a difference.

Reminds me of a Few Good Men, when Tom Cruise said out loud of his intention to file a motion, and it was denied by the judge. TC then asked the judge to wait until he actually filed the motion before a ruling was made.

Not that it actually matters but I'm a little annoyed Billy pulled the plug on his feeding frenzy of a thread so I'll go ahead and respond to this.

You asked if you could nominate it and I replied that you could not. Grune cited the correct rule, I believe you should have it in a paragraph in the back of your event security and non lethal crowd control procedures manual that you keep in the breast pocket of your winter bdus.

There was nobody from Louisiana except for Dave. But, his vote counts for a lot.

Anywho, back on topic, I have been researching NCAA Rules/Rgulations pertaining to timing/shot clock in preparation of the JUCO Tournament.

Well, Thank God! It's nice to know that our great nation is in such good hands.

Can you please do something about those pesky strip-searchs at the airport next?

I see nothing wrong with those security procedures. Being that I have a pacemaker, I cannot go through metal detectors so I am always having to have a pat-down done in order to go through security checkpoints.

As I see it the only ones that should be exempt from going through the security scanners are those that have a medical exemption with the proper documentation.

Now need to back on topic concerning the thread, everyone does.

"People who trade freedom for security deserve neither." Ben Franklin

We have a 4th amendment right from unreasonable SEARCH and seizure. The TSA could easily follow the El-AL model and search only those people whom they have a reason to search allowing the rest of use our "peace and quiet enjoyment."

Let's not turn this into a political discussion. We know where that will end up.

thank you

"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

I will refrain from any further posts in this thread regarding our freedom.