What's The Correct Call ???

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Gee, all I did was quote you verbatim, Camron. Are you calling yourself a liar?

I'm glad that you're still so adamant also that any official who screws up some rules deserves all the abuse any coach can give him. I'm glad because I'll never have to work with someone like you.

When another official does it, he has a complete lack of rules knowledge and makes stuff up with no basis for anything. But when you do the exact same thing, you're taking an unusual play and extrapolating from existing rulings that were close to the same thing. Hey, who cares if your extrapolations go directly against existing rules? Hell, that don't make no nevermind if you're the one doing it instead of some other official, does it?


Yup, I got it.

Your very own words show your true colors very nicely imo, Camron.

'Nuff said.

Are you so insecure or incapable of intelligent debate that you have to resort to mudslinging and personalizing while avoiding the points of the actual argument? You're basically admitting you're wrong when you do that. Stick to the point, if you can.

You said you can't travel without holding the ball. Case plays were cited that prove you wrong (it may be the general case, but there are exceptions).

Now, show me where the cited case plays are wrong.....the ones that end with a ruling of traveling even though the player, just like the play I was responding to, is not holding the ball at the time of the foot movement. Are you really saying the NFHS is wrong?

If you're capable, show my why. (I'm sure you'll dodge the question again and call me some other names.)

I'm pretty sure that if I had said it was legal, you would have taken the other side just to argue.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

If you're capable, show my why. (I'm sure you'll dodge the question again and call me some other names.)

I'm pretty sure that if I had said it was legal, you would have taken the other side just to argue.

I don't believe I've called you any names yet. I've just let your very own words do all the talking. You get awfully excited when all that really happened was someone quoting your exact words.

And I think that I'll just leave it at that. There's no need for me to discuss anything further with you. There's no upside for either of us.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

I don't believe I've called you any names yet. I've just let your very own words do all the talking. You get awfully excited when all that really happened was someone quoting your exact words.

And I think that I'll just leave it at that. There's no need for me to discuss anything further with you. There's no upside for either of us.

As expected, dodge the question again. How pathetic.

All you can do is distract the discussion from your mistake by trying to knock down anyone who opposes you. Your juvenile bullying tactics might work on rookies but some people are wise enough to see through your crap.

[Judtech]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

As expected, dodge the question again. How pathetic.

All you can do is distract the discussion from your mistake by trying to knock down anyone who opposes you. Your juvenile bullying tactics might work on rookies but some people are wise enough to see through your crap.

Made me think of a great line from SCROOGED w/Bill Murray:
As he is in an elevator, the Ghost of Christmas Future is invading his space:
"Back off big guy, that move might work with the chicks but not with me!"

(other great line: "Have you tried staples?")

No back to our regularly scheduled thread