![]() |
Watch Me Fire Up The Afterburners ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the violation occurs in the old FC on the old lead's sideline, the old lead takes it. If the violation occurs in the old BC on the old lead's sideline, the old trail takes it. If the violation occurs in the old FC on the old trail's sideline, the old trail takes it. If the violation occurs in the old BC on the old trail's sideline, the old trail takes it. In all cases, the "other" official boxes in....perhaps causing a coast-to-coast. Bump and run ONLY occurs when the new throwin spot is in the new backcourt on the old trail's sideline. The case where it causes a coast-to-coast for the old-lead -> new lead is rare. |
Quote:
Six states for me now and we've all handled this situation exactly the same. None, thank goodness, were IAABO states. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You've got one guy, essentially running straight across the court for the throwin while the other guy runs a crossing route to the other end when the throw-in was on his sideline. The Old/New Lead could use the Old/New Trail as a pick if he wanted to on this The only time I don't B&R is when the violation occurs right in front of the Old Trail in a situation where the Old Lead hasn't gone too far down the court. This is typically in a press or short-lived transition situation. Even then, it's understood that it's not proper mechanic. If you don't bump-and-run, you're essentially creating a switch on a non-foul situation. |
I have always thought that this is the correct process:
1. Is it a shooting foul? If yes, calling official becomes trail. If no, go to 2. 2. Is it a non-shooting foul? If yes, officials switch "vertically". If no, go to 3. 3. Is the spot in the "new" backcourt? If yes, old lead (or new trail, if not involving change in possession) becomes new trail and administers throw-in. If no, go to 4. 4. If 1-3 do not apply (that is, no foul involved and throw-in in the "new" frountcourt), the official who has responsiblity for that line administers the throw-in. If this requires a "switch" from trail to lead, so be it. Sideline throw-ins below the free throw line extended may be administered by lead or trail. Any of these incorrect? Any situations missed? |
Let me clean up my statements...they were a bit incomplete...
If you're going by the book... NON-TURNOVER (new/old trail takes all BC throw-ins and trail's FC sideline, remains trail)
TURNOVER (old-lead/new-trail takes all throw-ins in the new backcourt and all throw-ins on their sideline)
|
Thanks, I Think ...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, is there a place other than these illustrations that lays out the principals for this? |
NFHS only prescribes the bump and run when the throwin will be in the new backcourt. Otherwise, you administer throw-ins on your line.
No, Snaqs, it is not only in effect on turn overs, it is a bump and run anytime there is a throwin that goes to the backcourt sideline opposite the trail...perhaps in a pressing situation where the ball is knocked OOB by the defense on the lead's line. Here is the NFHS mechanic from the book NFHS Manual #128 |
Quote:
|
IAABO Two Person Manual Page 51 ...
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5216/...f258c2ce_m.jpg
"During fast break situation, ball out of bounds on Lead's sideline. Lead administers throwin as new Trail. Trail becomes new Lead." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03pm. |