FTs or no FTs

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Isn't part of the definition of false double foul that one of the fouls occurs AFTER the other....which can't be simultaneous???

No, just that one of the attributes of a double foul is missing. Since the double foul includes "at approximately the same time", one after the other would meet the "missing' requirement.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Isn't part of the definition of false double foul that one of the fouls occurs AFTER the other....which can't be simultaneous???

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

No, just that one of the attributes of a double foul is missing. Since the double foul includes "at approximately the same time", one after the other would meet the "missing' requirement.

What about this?

the second of which occurs before the clock is started following the first