What is the proper penalty and admin?

[pizanno]

NCAA Men 10-5.1.h

(Men) CLASS A Unsporting Technical Infractions
Art. 1. A player or substitute committing an unsportsmanlike act including, but not limited to, the following:
h. Leaving the playing court and going into the stands when a fight may break out or has broken out (flagrant non-contact infraction).

NCAA Women 10-4.1.f and/or i
Bench Technical Foul
f. Inciting undesirable crowd reactions
i. Refusing to occupy the team bench to which the team was assigned or to occupy the location for a timeout or before any extra period as described in Rule 4-7.2.

PENALTY: Two free throws shall be awarded to any member of the offended team.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by pizanno

NCAA Men 10-5.1.h

(Men) CLASS A Unsporting Technical Infractions
Art. 1. A player or substitute committing an unsportsmanlike act including, but not limited to, the following:
h. Leaving the playing court and going into the stands when a fight may break out or has broken out (flagrant non-contact infraction).

NCAA Women 10-4.1.f and/or i
Bench Technical Foul
f. Inciting undesirable crowd reactions
i. Refusing to occupy the team bench to which the team was assigned or to occupy the location for a timeout or before any extra period as described in Rule 4-7.2.

PENALTY: Two free throws shall be awarded to any member of the offended team.

Since he said 3rd quarter, we have to assume this isn't an NCAA game.

[zm1283]

10-5-5
Technical charged directly to head coach
2 FTs for opposing team and throw-in at division line

[tjones1]

I agree, 10-5-5.

But, seems odd as if you apply that rule then the bench player can still play in the game, right?

[Adam]

I think you could invoke 4-18 or 4-19-4.

[zm1283]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I think you could invoke 4-18 or 4-19-4.

But can you charge the HC directly with the technical AND the player with a flagrant technical for the same infraction? Or would you consider the player leaving the bench in the first place the HC's direct technical and if the player fights, he gets a separate flagrant technical?

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

I think you could invoke 4-18 or 4-19-4.

Snaqwells, my initial thought is this apply to players. I more incline to go with 10-5-5.

[tjones1]

Anyone else nervous as to why NV is posting this situation? Ha Ha.

Probably won't be able to sleep tonight.

I stick by my ruling in 10-5-5...seems pretty straight forward. But like I said it appears the bench player can still play in the game.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by truerookie

Snaqwells, my initial thought is this apply to players. I more incline to go with 10-5-5.

10-4-1d,f or g.
You're right, 10-5-5 is for the coach, and it would be a stretch to boot the player when you're only applying the T to the coach.

My first instinct is to hit the player directly (coach indirectly) using 10-4-1d or 10-4-4; making it flagrant based on 4-18 or 4-19-4.