![]() |
Quote:
Anyone remember what happened on the Weber/Michigan technical? I sure don't, and I also realize it may or may not be correct. I lean on the side of having the TO, then administering the FTs. The TO was requested and granted first, that then caused the technical foul. Plus (the more I think about it) a team could request a TO after a technical were called and before the throws were administered and it would be granted and administered prior to the throws. Yep, I've talked myself into administering the TO first, then the technical foul. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
;) |
Quote:
Now, I'm not sure how I'll handle it when he disagrees with me. |
Why was the team complaining if the official had started his count? Morons.[/QUOTE]
I am a moron, and am very offended.:p |
Quote:
You sure that's how it's spelled? :D http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/U/moran.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
(I know this is off topic, but aren't you getting goosebumps knowing we're getting close to the start of the Annual Baseball Thread?!?) Anyway, back to the TO's. Doesn't Bob's advice follow the NFHS "standard procedure" applying penalties in the order they occured? So, in the case of the excess TO request, the TO was granted, then it was determined it was an excessive TO, so it makes sense the penalty comes after the TO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So, thanks for asking, but no, I'd rather not get into that now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/U/moran.jpg[/quote] Nice that he also posted his name for everyone to see. Oh, wait that's IA. :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I used the term "penalties" in a general sense, rather than imply there was more than one penalty specific to this situation. I would think that is no different than reading about how "...applications will be accepted at the main office through Friday...", although personally I'm going to only submit one application. (I sure hope mbyron backs me up on this one...) And, of course: shut up. :D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48am. |