Dan,what would you do in the head coach and 3T sitch?That is a good question.I can certainly see why Chuck could get ticked off so badly.You pretty well KNOW you are being conned.

If you know who the head coach is, why would you let him stay? In my HS games, I know who the head coaches are, simply b/c I see them 2 or 3 times a season, many of them come down for a beer on Friday nights. I know who they are. So if this happened in one of my games (at the HS level, anyway), the head coach is leaving the bench. If I knowingly allowed the head coach to stay, I think I'd catch a lot of trouble for that. Just my opinion.

Quote:

Btw,why would you get so ticked off at the 3 players who dunked?All you can do is charge each one of them with a T.Am I missing something here?

I'm not ticked, JR; but the coach sure is. My guess is that come practice on Monday afternoon, Coach is gonna clean house. Hence, I have a strong suspicion that this will be their last game with the team. (BTW, I was just kidding about actually saying that to them. I might ask them what was going on, but I wouldn't ever tell them that they were "done".)

BTW again, this actually happened about 5 seasons ago in an Indiana HS game. First 3 kids in the lay-up line dunked, coach was ejected. Apparently, the kids felt that the coach had been abusive in practices that week and had decided to get him tossed.

Chuck

[Edited by ChuckElias on Sep 3rd, 2002 at 12:46 PM]

The only thing I'm p'ed about is that Pedro's hip will keep him from kicking Roger's fat butt tomorrow night. Don't get quite so cocky yet. The Sox have a much easier schedule than the Yanks, Angels, or M's for the rest of the season.

Chuck

..., but looking the wrong way. ;)

If you know who the head coach is, why would you let him stay? In my HS games, I know who the head coaches are, simply b/c I see them 2 or 3 times a season, many of them come down for a beer on Friday nights. I know who they are. So if this happened in one of my games (at the HS level, anyway), the head coach is leaving the bench. If I knowingly allowed the head coach to stay, I think I'd catch a lot of trouble for that. Just my opinion.[/B][/QUOTE]Chuck,I'm in the same boat that you are.I assign games for our association,so I know who the head coach of every team certainly is.The problem for the official at the game is that he can't be 100% sure if the goober is lying to him or not.I've had coaches that would do this type of thing,if they were smart enough to think of it.I just think that it might be better to put your suspicions in a game report,and hopefully the conference,league,AD etc.will take care of the problem.I would think that if the league has it's head screwed on right,there would be more repercussions to a coach trying to pull something like this than a simple ejection for too many players dunking in the warm-up.JMO.
Btw,we have a rule that officials cannot drink with coaches after a game.This got put in about 30 years ago when one of our guys slugged a coach who was giving him a hard time.Bad scene all the way around.

It is a good question, so good I was trying to ignore it...

I had something like this happen to me this summer at an
AAU tourney. Guy I knew to be the assistant starts off in
the first minute loudly complaining about stupid stuff. I
T him, tell the table it's 1 + indirect on the head coach.
Head coach gets up, says I'm not the HC, I'm the assistant.
Great, all I know is I have 1 hr and 10 minutes to get the
next game started, including 5 minutes for me to have a
break. So I tell them both the next T on the bench is
flagrant, you guys decide. But that was AAU where you
gotta carry a big stick. In a "real" game I'm not sure
how I would handle it, while I'm tempted by Chuck's
"who-you-foolin'" response I suspect I would do it your
way. I think I would also tell them both I know what just
happened and he had better be on his best behavior.

LOL!

East W L PCT GB
NY Yankees 84 52 .618 ---
Boston 77 58 .570 6 1/2

If NY goes .500 for the rest of the year Boston needs to
win 20 out of their remaining 27 just to tie. I suppose
the Sox have a chance of catching the Angels or the M's for
the wild card, but being a Yankees fan I don't concern
myself with the (ahem) *wildcard* races. :eek:

Sounds good to me.
In a "real" game,you're naturally gonna know who the actual head coach is when you do your pre-game introduction thingy.The only way that there is ever any doubt is the sitch we were talking about-where you get a T before you definitely find out who the head coach is.Then,you maybe can give them the benefit of the doubt in that case,while seat-belting both of them and putting them on a real short leash.That also pretty well covers your own butt,if anyone wants to question your judgement after the fact.
The good thing is that most coaches would never dream of pulling any crap like this.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. After thinking some
more it might be smart to not announce the T's until you
know who the HC is.

Ref: "Good evening coach. You'll be the head coach tonight?
Coach: "Yes that's right."
Ref: "I got some bad news for you coach..."

I coach girls. If my first three dunk, they don't need my help out there! :)