More T or no T

[Adam]

Originally Posted by slow whistle

The cb play says that a player who strikes it "so forcefully that it cannot be ignored" should be tech'd, doesn't say anything about whether it has to do with basketball or not.

The rule says if it's part of a blocked shot attempt, it should be ignored regardless of how hard it is.

[slow whistle]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The rule says if it's part of a blocked shot attempt, it should be ignored regardless of how hard it is.

Agree, but how is that relevant in this play?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by slow whistle

Agree, but how is that relevant in this play?

Can't get YouTube here at work...what did Gomez do? Dunk the basketball then smack the backboard? Did he lightly tap it or was it a full-on palm to backboard slap?

[slow whistle]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Can't get YouTube here at work...what did Gomez do? Dunk the basketball then smack the backboard? Did he lightly tap it or was it a full-on palm to backboard slap?

It was a smack, but not overly hard IMO and he didn't scream or anything, just turned and ran down the floor. I've seen this passed on probably hundreds of times (including myself), although I did call one where there was a primal scream accompanying the smack and it was quite a bit more than a "tap".

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by slow whistle

It was a smack, but not overly hard IMO and he didn't scream or anything, just turned and ran down the floor. I've seen this passed on probably hundreds of times (including myself), although I did call one where there was a primal scream accompanying the smack and it was quite a bit more than a "tap".

Agree with your description. He slapped it with his palm, but not forcefully, no accompanying display, etc.

By rule, the T could be supported. By practice, I'm surprised this one was called. From what I see on the video I'd pass.

Of course, everything happens within a context and maybe there was something else that happened prior to this to make the officials more "touchy" on this one.

[Loudwhistle]

The tap was so light I wouldn't have called it, if we would have yelled at the same time, T!

[Indianaref]

What'cha got on this?

Edit: I meant to put this on another thread.

[fiasco]

Originally Posted by slow whistle

I've seen this passed on probably hundreds of times (including myself), although I did call one where there was a primal scream accompanying the smack and it was quite a bit more than a "tap".

I remember an NCAA Tournament game where Greg Oden slapped the backboard with two hands after a dunk and screamed. No call.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by slow whistle

Agree, but how is that relevant in this play?

It was more of a general statement in response to your statement that "doesn't say anything about whether it has to do with basketball or not."

[jeffpea]

I think the group is confusing two different situations....slapping the backboard while attempting to block a shot is one thing (and legal); slapping the backboard after a dunk is an entirely different situation (and an automatic T)....

good call by the official in this game...this is a T every time it happens....

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jeffpea

I think the group is confusing two different situations....slapping the backboard while attempting to block a shot is one thing (and legal); slapping the backboard after a dunk is an entirely different situation (and an automatic T)....

good call by the official in this game...this is a T every time it happens....

I'm not confusing jack. I was just stating that whether it has to do with basketball is relevant.

Automatic? OK.

[slow whistle]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

It was more of a general statement in response to your statement that "doesn't say anything about whether it has to do with basketball or not."

Understood. I think you realize that my comment was more in reference to asdf's characterization of this play, but you are right more generally speaking it does matter.

[A Pennsylvania Coach]

T