Bench Personel Enter court during fight

[refnuts]

A1 and B1 are fighting.

Bench personel A6 ,B6, and B7 enter the court but do not participate in the fight.

A1,B1,A6,B6,B7 are ejected.

One bench technical to each team for players entering court during fight.
Each coach reveives one indirect technical.

No free throws shot(point of interuption) or does team A get 2 because less playes have entered the court.

My gut is telling me no free throws after reading through rule 10.

[tjones1]

You are correct, no throws.

2 throws for B.

[Da Official]

I don't have my book in front of me but I'm pretty sure no shots in this situation.

[TimTaylor]

Originally Posted by Da Official

I don't have my book in front of me but I'm pretty sure no shots in this situation.

Guess again.....A would get 2 FT's & the ball at the division line

A1, B1, A6, B6 & B7 each get a direct flagrant T, both coaches get one indirect T, and all fouls except the indirects count towards the team total.

Fighting:
a. Players on the court:
(1) Corresponding number from each team – double flagrant fouls, all
participants are disqualified, no free throws are awarded, ball is
put in play at the point of interruption.
(2) Numbers of participants are not corresponding – Flagrant fouls
and disqualification for all participants, two free throws are
awarded for the offended team for each additional player, offended
team awarded a division line throw in.
b. Bench personnel leaving the team bench during a fight or when a fight
may break out:
(1) Do NOT participate in the fight – nonparticipants are assessed
flagrant fouls and disqualified. The head coach is assessed a
maximum of one indirect technical foul (regardless of the number
leaving the bench). If the number leaving the bench for each team
is corresponding, no free throws are awarded, and the ball is put
in play at the point of interruption. If the number leaving the bench
for each team is unequal, a maximum of two free throws are
awarded the offended team, followed by a division line throw-in
opposite the table.
(2) Participate in the fight – all participants are assessed flagrant
fouls and disqualified. The head coach is assessed one indirect
technical foul for each person leaving the bench and participating
in the fight. If the number leaving the bench for each team is
corresponding, no free throws are awarded, and the ball is put in
play at the point of interruption. If the number leaving the bench
for each team is unequal, two free throws are awarded the
offended team for each additional person leaving the bench,
followed by a division line throw-in opposite the table.
NOTE: All fouls (except an indirect technical foul charged to the head coach) count toward
the team's foul count in the half.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by tjones1

You are correct, no throws.

Nope, two shots for the team with fewer players off the bench.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Nope, two shots for the team with fewer players off the bench.

In Tanner's defense, I believe he knew that, but simply mis-read the fact that B had one more player that left the bench than A.

His lack of reading comprehension comes from an issue of karma - passing through town without acknowledging his officiating buddies, for example, would do that.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

In Tanner's defense, I believe he knew that, but simply mis-read the fact that B had one more player that left the bench than A.

His lack of reading comprehension comes from an issue of karma - passing through town without acknowledging his officiating buddies, for example, would do that.

You are correct... I miscounted.

To my credit, while I was eating at Buffalo Wild Wings I did think about ya... and I think that should count.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by tjones1

You are correct... I miscounted.

To my credit, while I was eating at Buffalo Wild Wings I did think about ya... and I think that should count.

Yea, yea, and you THOUGHT about about calling me to join you, and THOUGHT about buying me a beer once I got there.

So, which finger am I thinking of now?...

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by tjones1

....while I was eating at Buffalo Wild Wings I did think about ya...

Was that because you wanted him to come over and pick up the check?

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Was that because you wanted him to come over and pick up the check?

Knowing Tanner, yep.

He has to save money for that second car to hold his "spare gear" bag.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

In Tanner's defense, I believe he knew that, but simply mis-read the fact that B had one more player that left the bench than A.

His lack of reading comprehension comes from an issue of karma - passing through town without acknowledging his officiating buddies, for example, would do that.

Does that count if you see Eastover NC on a highway sign if you have a full car and are moving from Vermont to Florida?

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Yea, yea, and you THOUGHT about about calling me to join you, and THOUGHT about buying me a beer once I got there.

So, which finger am I thinking of now?...

Ummm, do I get five guesses and the first four do not count?!

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Was that because you wanted him to come over and pick up the check?

Hey, fair is fair... I would have bought him a cold one...on his tab

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Was that because you wanted him to come over and pick up the check?

He may have been afraid that after he picked up the check he would have handed it over to his 'host' and bid him farewell.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

Does that count if you see Eastover NC on a highway sign if you have a full car and are moving from Vermont to Florida?

If you didn't actually enter the city limits, you should be fine.

(But the karma bus has been known to follow strange and unknown paths...)

[SmokeEater]

Is this the finger?