The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 10:44am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Good little question to test the brain this morning

Got this in my weekly rules questions email.

Before the last free throw of a multiple free throw situation #42 from Team B is beckoned into the game for Team B. #32 goes to the bench and sits down. As #42 approaches the free throw lane, the official notices that his jersey is untucked and sends him out of the game. #32 gets off the bench and returns to the game. After the successful free throw, #42, who has returned to the table, is beckoned into the game by the officials. Were the officials correct?

Please respond with whether the officials were correct and, if not, what should have happened.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 109
Neither player can come back into the game until the next subsitution opportunity after the clock has properly started.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 276
Does "has to sit a tick, doesn't have to play a tick" apply here?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Yep.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Yep, B42 became a player when he was beckoned onto the court. B32 left and was bench personnel. B42 then had to leave the game.

At this point, the officials should have required a different sub for B42 rather than allowing B32 to come on the court.

Even after that mistake, the second mistake was allowing B42 into the game after the next free throw, as he also had gone from player to bench personnel before time had elapsed.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 12:26pm
rsl rsl is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 301
I agree with all the above, but it would be even better if the untucked shirt was noticed before #42 enters the game. If he is not allowed to sub in, he can fix the problem immediately and avoid the problem altogether.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 10:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsl View Post
I agree with all the above, but it would be even better if the untucked shirt was noticed before #42 enters the game. If he is not allowed to sub in, he can fix the problem immediately and avoid the problem altogether.
Or if the official had simply asked #42 to tuck his shirt in while he was on the floor instead of directing him to leave.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 23, 2009, 10:28pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Or if the official had simply asked #42 to tuck his shirt in while he was on the floor instead of directing him to leave.
Way to ruin the scenario. Let's assume the official had informed #42 previously that he needed to be ready to play next time.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 24, 2009, 06:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 299
splitting hairs

Fellas, you're splitting hairs...

Either let the kid tuck his shirt in before you administer the second free throw, or if you're that vigilant about him coming into the game with the jersey tucked in, than rule that the substitution never happened and put 32 back into the game...

If you're going to go 'by the book' in this situation you're not:
a) using good preventative officiating
b) gonna get along with most coaches
c) in many areas, going to move up and get bigger and better assignments...

Just my .02
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 24, 2009, 11:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt S. View Post
Fellas, you're splitting hairs...

Either let the kid tuck his shirt in before you administer the second free throw, or if you're that vigilant about him coming into the game with the jersey tucked in, than rule that the substitution never happened and put 32 back into the game...

If you're going to go 'by the book' in this situation you're not:
a) using good preventative officiating
b) gonna get along with most coaches
c) in many areas, going to move up and get bigger and better assignments...

Just my .02
Matt, I think most of us would find a way to manage this situation. The point of this exercise is to think through the rules completely and utilize that knowledge in a similar situation when, for some reason, it wouldn't be able to be managed around. It's the point of most discussions on the board.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT: STS-123 Tuesday Morning tjones1 Basketball 14 Mon Mar 17, 2008 01:05pm
Brain fart question roadking Basketball 2 Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:47am
Brain Teaser question David Emerling Softball 43 Tue Sep 04, 2007 09:42pm
Good article in the local paper this morning OverAndBack Football 1 Sat Sep 16, 2006 08:43am
I have a good test question..see if you can get this one JTRICE Basketball 17 Thu Feb 02, 2006 09:06pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1