NFHS 2009-10 Basketball Rules Interpretations SITUATION 3

[Back In The Saddle]

The NFHS is the rules making body. If they say black is white, then black is white (at least in games played strictly under their rules). They may be inconsistent, but they are not wrong.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

The NFHS is the rules making body. If they say black is white, then black is white (at least in games played strictly under their rules). They may be inconsistent, but they are not wrong.

I agree with Snaqs.

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

When faced with an interp that contradicts a rule, I think it's safe to call it by the rule.

[Daryl H. Long]

My interp is consistent with rules also. Any B violation causes a new throw in. I for one do not blindly follow NF in such blatantly wrong interpretations.

For those of you who believe the NF ruling I need you to clarify a few points.

1. There are a number of violations that B could commit before an AP throwin ends. Which ones result in a new throw in awarded to team A?

2. WHAT criteria Has the NF has provided to determine whether to award a new throw in or not?

3. What makes one violation more egregious than another that would allow team A to be awarded a new throw in in one case and not a new Throw in given another violation?

All interpretations need to be consistent by Rule.

Therefore:
ALL violations of throw in by A on AP throw in also cause loss of arrow. Award new throw in to Team B.
ALL violations of throw in by B on AP throw in also allow A to retain arrow. Award new throw in to Team A.