![]() |
aggressive block out
Just finished my first boys JV game of the year. All went well, but I have a question.
On most of the three point shots put up by one team, the defending team would turn around, reach back with one hand to find the shooter, and then aggressively block out the shooter. Sometimes it was so quick that they would step under the airborne shooter, but most of the time they would catch the shooter just after landing. It was generally too mild for a whistle, and it had clearly been coached. It made me wonder if it is an intimidation technique- make the shooter think about the landing instead of the shot. Anybody else seen this? |
Was there . . .
. . . displacement? Sounds like it
|
If they're undercutting the shooter, it sure sounds like a foul. They're likely coached to do it until they get called. "Agressive box-out" is generally a euphamism for pushing.
|
Quote:
This might just be good basketball, unless they are a tad fast and they get under the shooter. Either way it is tough to call. |
Quote:
As a coach, we worked extremely hard on boxing out -- not, boxing out hard, but rather working hard to box out on every shot. In all my years of coaching (well over 25), I rarely ever had a player penalized for "boxing out." However, opposing players (and our players) could regularly get away with contact from the back on rebounds (frequently called "over the back" by parents and coaches). Therefore, a good solid box out was critical to our success. Based on your description, you seem to have noticed behavior that, while taught, quite possibly was not within the spirit of the rules. While there may be a fine line in this case. My guess is that a team was permitted to get away with getting very physical on rebounds without penalty. But, in fairness, I was not there. |
The defense does not get to "box out" an airborne shooter. That's a foul. Every time.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Thanks guys- I think I needed some positive reinforcement to make this call.
I called only one last night. I probably should have had two or three. My partner didn't call any and he was the R, so I followed his lead a little. I'll be a little stronger next time. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Now that it looks like everyone agrees, this foul needs to be called let me tell you this story.
A regular partner of mine was doing a BV scrimmage last week and had this very call. He watched the shooter down, the block-out displaced and he called the foul. The 3-pointer was good and the team got the ball back for a throw-in. After reporting the foul, the offended coach and host of the scrimmage said, "you better not call that in a varsity game." :eek: Apparently all coaches don't agree with us. Wait, I already knew that. ;) |
Quote:
The play that you described in your story does not involve an airborne shooter being fouled. It is completely different. The players and coaches accept protecting the AIRBORNE shooter from him being undercut and awarding one FT on made goals, they generally don't accept fouls being called against players who have already returned to the floor for minor contact resulting in the goal counting and the team getting the ball back for a throw-in, unless the contact is egregious and knocks the player into the third row. The coach was absolutely right in his comment about how the varsity game is generally called, and your partner needs to learn the distinction. |
Quote:
Not only do they undercut the shooter, but sometimes they will extend their arms around each side of the shooter basically boxing them in. If the shooter even attempts to move around them, I got a hold. You make the calls and 1 of 2 things will happen. Either they will stop or they will foul out. Choice is theirs. Mregor |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24am. |