![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Throw-in is from the spot nearest the foul. POI has nothing to do with it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the play in question, the interruption is the foul, the POI is the basket and ensuing throwin. |
Quote:
POI is used only when there's a double foul, an inadvertant whistle, a correctable error, ... It's not used when there's a single foul (except for most single non-flagrant T's in NCAA) or a false double foul, .... So, it's not relevant in your play. Terminology matters. |
Quote:
So no there was no application of POI by definition in the play. |
Quote:
If the foul by A2 took place in a location on the floor which would not result in a throw-in somewhere along the end line of Team B's backcourt, then the throw-in would simply be a designated-spot throw-in from the OOB location nearest to where the foul was committed. That was something worth pointing out to people. |
Quote:
My gut says spot throw in from the appropriate spot determined by the location of the foul. BUT that would in a way permit the fouling team to gain an advantage, so to speak, of negating the advantage team B would have to run the endline after a made basket. Gonna have to check the books on that. Dont have them at my desk. [edit: serves me right to respond to the post before reading to the end of the thread to see if anyone answered the question. Thanks Nevada. -Clark] |
Just to answer your point about the advantage; it's a wash. As an offense, would you rather have an endline throwin or a spot throwin on the sideline, further down court?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23pm. |