The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 09, 2002, 04:14am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Re: Agreed, the NF is hazy but that's nothing new.

Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
My point is that it's not necessary to have contact to have fighting. Fighting is a technical foul. So, you can have a technical for fighting during a live ball.
I still don't know whether you should call fighting during play a T in Fed,Tony.Casebook play 10.4.4SitA covers a fight during play and states the penalty is flagrant personal fouls. Casebook play 10.4.4SitB covers a fight during a deadball/clock stopped scenario,and states the penalty is now flagrant technical fouls.Don't you think that pretty well gives you the guideline to use,even with the other hazy language that is used?
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 09, 2002, 09:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
Quote:
Originally posted by Stan

I'm not an experienced expert, however, if the defender made a fist and if the defender put that fist where a person would anticipate the shooters gonads would be when he came off the shot, I would vote for #1, any season and any league. [/B]
I agree 100%...this player is history!
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 09, 2002, 11:48am
JLK JLK is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 31
toss him!!

I had something like this happen to me the very last game of this past season. Boy's game. Home team has ball and player gets past defender and drives the baseline. As player goes around the defender, the defender throws a high elbow to the back of the offensive player's head. There was no contact made but because where the swing was aimed at, I tossed the defender from the game. He got beat and tried to take a cheap shot at the player (not very good sportmanship, I'd say).

Defender's coach never said a word to me when I called it.

Let's be honest, do you think most coaches (other than the ones on this board) are going to know (or much less care) that you should have called a flagrant intentional foul vs a technical foul when it comes to a player ejection for specific situations?

And if a coach does question me on what type of foul I'm calling concerning an ejection, I'm going to tell him that regardless of what foul call I make, the player's action warranted his/her removal from the game.

Lastly, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but are not both types of fouls in an ejection situation going to do the following:

1. going to toss a player from the game
2. count toward's the team's foul total
3. require a write up to the state association

When and what to call is important but if something that unsportmanship like occurs, it's best to nip in the bud right away. So you use the wrong call signal in this situation, but get offending player out of the game, I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 09, 2002, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,138
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
I kinda like #2,if you know the coach will sit the kid down without giving you a hassle about it.The extra FT and giving up the ball might help teach him not to do it again.Numbers 1 & 3 are viable,too,but #4 isn't IMO.
What extra FT? Whether it's an IP or a FP, three-shots are awarded, just like on a P for a missed three-point shot.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 09, 2002, 12:15pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
I kinda like #2,if you know the coach will sit the kid down without giving you a hassle about it.The extra FT and giving up the ball might help teach him not to do it again.Numbers 1 & 3 are viable,too,but #4 isn't IMO.
What extra FT? Whether it's an IP or a FP, three-shots are awarded, just like on a P for a missed three-point shot.
Geeze,blew that one,didn't I? Don't know whatinthehell I was thinking about.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 09, 2002, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 337
If I'm the coach, his or the opponent's, it better at least option 2, and probably option 1. If I'm the parent of either kid, it better be option 1. I know you're an official, and governed by the rules, but this is the kind of action that can have serious repercussions if not managed correctly.
__________________
If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to be a horrible warning.

- Catherine Aird
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1