Backcourt Violation

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by jdmara

(Forgive me for not remembering the case number as I do not have my books in front of me).
-Josh

It wasn't a case play and has never been published in one of the books. It was actually an interpretation published on the NFHS website, specifically situation 10 in the 2007-08.

And it was totally bogus!

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

It wasn't a case play and has never been published in one of the books. It was actually an interpretation published on the NFHS website, specifically situation 10 in the 2007-08.

And it was totally bogus!

Was? Past tense? Has anything ever been published which negated this interp?
If not, is it still considered to be the official position of the NFHS until we read otherwise?

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Was? Past tense? Has anything ever been published which negated this interp?
If not, is it still considered to be the official position of the NFHS until we read otherwise?

Yes. The rule book.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Yes. The rule book.

amen

But I think you know what I meant.

Does this mean the ones that write the interps are not required to read the rule book?

[AKOFL]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

It wasn't a case play and has never been published in one of the books. It was actually an interpretation published on the NFHS website, specifically situation 10 in the 2007-08.

And it was totally bogus!

Which one are you Nevada? Bill or Ted? Are you still havind an excellent adventure?