![]() |
NCAA Tourney - Marquette v. Missouri
Was watching the end of the Marquette v. Missouri game and I saw 2 interesting end of game situations.
1) When a Mizzou player was fouled in the act of shooting, he was grimacing and was "injured" that he was unable to attempt the free throws. As expected, a better free throw shooter from the bench subbed for him and took the free throws (he made both). After the free throws, the original "injured" player entered back to the game. I know this is allowed in the official NCAA rules. But what surprised me was there was no restriction on when the "injured" player can come back in. So why aren't more coaches using this legal procedure of faking an injury if the fouled player is bad at free throws? Or maybe we really live in a world where most coaches honor the intent of the rule and not abuse it. 2) Is it really a throw-in violation when the player inbounding the ball stepped on the end line? The color commentator was pretty emphatic about it, but I couldn't find it in the rules. I'm a HS official and I know that in HS, this is NOT a violation, at least not when it's after a field goal. The most you can do is stop the play and do a repeat of the throw-in. Is it covered under the rule of the spot throw-in and it's technically leaving the spot? Thanks. |
2) The Marquette player didn't step ON the endline, he clearly stepped OVER the endline by several inches. It was a great call backed up by the replay. T was all over it. The Marquette coach apparently was looking for an off-ball foul prior to the violation (my interpretation of his demonstrative behavior).
The game certainly had an exciting ending! Surely it was March Madness. |
Quote:
My question: since the player who was too injured to shoot free throws can play seconds after being replaced, could the officials invoke the rule which is a techincal foul for intentionally allowing the wrong player to shoot the free throws? If he was legtimately injured, he wouldn't have been able to go back in that soon (one could assume, I hope). And the coach and team should know that he should have shot the free throws. 2) His toe touched the playing court inbounds. Part of the foot has to touch inbounds, not all of it. |
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In #2, yes this is a violation as it is in HS. There are numerous rules that make this a violation. Most notably for NFHS rule 9-2-5. My biggest question at the end of the game, is why did L not have a whistle for OOB with 1.1 seconds left? He just kinda turned to get the ball from the camera man. He seemed a little confused, like he thought the game was over. |
Quote:
2) God I hope you're really not a HS official |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
I've Been Patiently Waiting For Just the Right Time For This:
Quote:
|
Did anyone have a foul on that last shot? I did.
I know, I know, don't decide the game. C had no angle on it. |
Quote:
Out of control player trying to cause contact on a heave. Based on what I saw, I do not think I would have called that if it was the first few minutes of the game. It has nothing to do with deciding the game, it just was not there. Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23pm. |