The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Buy your way out of violation? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/51689-buy-your-way-out-violation.html)

Nevadaref Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:12am

It has always been clear to me. I found it strange that the case book used to say to stop the game and give the ball back to the FTer without any penalty, but that's what I did because that was what the ruling said to do.
Now I don't that anymore.

He lost it. It's no longer at his disposal. Seems simple and logical to me.

Adam Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:16am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevadaref (Post 580689)
It has always been clear to me. I found it strange that the case book used to say to stop the game and give the ball back to the FTer without any penalty, but that's what I did because that was what the ruling said to do.
Now I don't that anymore.

He lost it. It's no longer at his disposal. Seems simple and logical to me.

I took a different reasoning for the case play; it prevents a defender from having to grab it and toss it away. Just call the violation. I agree with your bewilderment on the previous case play.

Your reasoning actually makes more sense to me, though.

JugglingReferee Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:21am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juulie Downs (Post 580515)
checkmark, meaning bad? Or good? what's right or wrong about what I said?

Checkmarks are good!

X's are bad.

NFC is reeeeaally bad. :eek:

Nevadaref Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee (Post 580698)
NFC is reeeeaally bad. :eek:

But they beat the AFC in the Pro Bowl this year. :confused:

Oh, that's not the NFC that you meant. :D


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1