Originally Posted by just another ref
(Post 557369)
By definition, there can be no fumble during a dribble.
Would calling it a "loss of control" during the dribble keep the player from a violation
just another ref
Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43am
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadking
(Post 557370)
Would calling it a "loss of control" during the dribble keep the player from a violation
A loss of control during a dribble is an interrupted dribble. In this case the player may recover the ball and continue the dribble.
Scrapper1
Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
(Post 557373)
A loss of control during a dribble is an interrupted dribble. In this case the player may recover the ball and continue the dribble.
By "recover", do you mean that the player can catch the ball (hold it)?
just another ref
Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:14pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
(Post 557392)
By "recover", do you mean that the player can catch the ball (hold it)?
Obviously not. That would end the dribble. But you knew that.
Scrapper1
Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
(Post 557396)
Obviously not. That would end the dribble.
Well, I asked because the word "recover", when used on tests, generally means to catch the ball. I didn't really think that's what you meant, but just wanted to clarify.
Quote:
But you knew that.
Hey, I can be as Socratic as Bob.
just another ref
Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:35pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
(Post 557402)
Well, I asked because the word "recover", when used on tests, generally means to catch the ball.
I thought about that, but when used with the phrase "and continue the dribble," I thought this would get the message across.