The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 20, 2002, 06:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2
Post

In Saturday's Lakers/Kings game, Kobe was holding the ball at the three point line. Doug Christie was crouched down, defending him closely. Kobe was holding the ball at about eye level, and when he pivoted he caught Christie in the face with an elbow. Chrisite fell to the ground and the official (Dick Bavetta I believe) immediately called a defensive blocking foul.

Correct call?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 20, 2002, 06:55pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Lightbulb Nothing or a block.

Quote:
Originally posted by zaheer
In Saturday's Lakers/Kings game, Kobe was holding the ball at the three point line. Doug Christie was crouched down, defending him closely. Kobe was holding the ball at about eye level, and when he pivoted he caught Christie in the face with an elbow. Chrisite fell to the ground and the official (Dick Bavetta I believe) immediately called a defensive blocking foul.

Correct call?

Either a block or a no call. Kobe did nothing but move the ball from one position to another. The action was not exaggerated or really outside of his vertical space. If anything Christie got up right next to Kobe and Kobe had no place to go. If you call anything, call a block. But I think you could have called nothing too. Just because you get hit in the face does not automatically mean that a foul has been against the person that hit you in the face. The rules of verticality should still apply.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 21, 2002, 06:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 385
Talking

It was a case of the official having the wrong angle,and making the call. On TV when you can come from 100 different angles on any given play, it is easy to make the call or no-call.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 21, 2002, 08:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52
I don't understand your reply AK, are you saying that the official was wrong. I think that you maybe but I think you need to think over how the principle of a vertical plain is called. What do you have here, if you see the whole play.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 21, 2002, 10:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2
hmmm...

Thanks for the responses.

I actually agree with JR's assesment that it could have been a no-call. Especially since the defense gained no advantage on the play.

The play just struck me as remarkable because I'm sure that if the same sequence of events happened in the post, and Shaq had the ball instead of Kobe, we would have been looking at an offensive foul.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 22, 2002, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 385
Talking

Iref21-all am am saying was from the officials point of view or angle(if you looked at where the official was standing in the replay) he probably did not see the elbow hit christie in the face. My point was, it is easy to be an armchair referee when we have many different angles to look at. I was not agreeing or disagreeing with the call.
I don't know about anyone else but, i have made a call because at the angle that it I was at it sure looked like a foul.

And actually to answer the question that you asked....what do you have here. An NBA game that to me has become more entertainment than a sport, and the official was protecting the superstar.

AK ref SE
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 29, 2002, 01:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 451
tonite, kobe threw the same elbow and a correct offensive foul was called, dicky b. must have had a bad angle or not seen the entire play. im glad joey c. got it right tonite
__________________
tony
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 29, 2002, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Re: Nothing or a block.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by JRutledge
Quote:
Originally posted by zaheer
In Saturday's Lakers/Kings game, Kobe was holding the ball at the three point line. Doug Christie was crouched down, defending him closely. Kobe was holding the ball at about eye level, and when he pivoted he caught Christie in the face with an elbow. Chrisite fell to the ground and the official (Dick Bavetta I believe) immediately called a defensive blocking foul.

Correct call?

Either a block or a no call. Kobe did nothing but move the ball from one position to another. The action was not exaggerated or really outside of his vertical space. If anything Christie got up right next to Kobe and Kobe had no place to go.
[/QUOTE

Sounds like great defense to me!

Quote:
If you call anything, call a block. But I think you could have called nothing too. Just because you get hit in the face does not automatically mean that a foul has been against the person that hit you in the face. The rules of verticality should still apply.

Peace

If Kobe was in his own vertical plane, how did he contact Christie who was only "right next to Kobe" and in a legal guarding position?

Sounds like anything but a block.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1