![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mr. Kettle, you might want to take your hand down.
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
However, I am quite surprised, after the breakdown of the frame-by-frame, that any one still thinks it could be a charge. The frame-by-frame unequivocally shows that the defender was still moving into the shooter's path at least 2 frames after the shooter was airborne. Given that, it can't possibly be a charge. The only counter to it is to wish the video was HDTV quality...but it was, as grainy as it was, sufficient to see what needed to be seen. |
Camron, the frame by frame may be clear to some, but it's not to others (including me). It's clear that you and I (and most others here) agree on what it would be if the variables are locked down. I've just seen (and heard during games) too many people say, "He wasn't set," or "he was moving." I've seen it on here, too.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Let us stop talking about this; we are not going to agree. And I am not really concerned about a travel that was not called and did not seem to matter in this game or even to the person that posted the video. Peace |
Quote:
The point made was completely legitimate. It is also not germane to this stoopid poll anyway. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It is really telling that you have to describe the play, instead of it jumping out at everyone to where they know which play you are talking about. And it is telling that you talk about what happens on TV rather than describe what actually was illegal about the play.
Peace |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30pm. |