![]() |
Poll: What do you have?
Okay, ignoring the OBVIOUS TRAVEL at the beginning...:D
What do you have at the other end? And I've made the votes public - just for fun :p ]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ifIOQrCA5Vk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ifIOQrCA5Vk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> |
Player Control foul.
Wait, sorry - I voted block. :D |
Quote:
|
I had a no-call on the other side of the board, gotta stick with it here.
|
Quote:
(I went from block to player control. I mean, c'mon, it was a 49-51 call.) |
Icing.
|
I have an issue that you are saying there was an obvious travel. When you do not see the ball, how do you know if there is control or there is not a bobble. It is not proper to call a travel just on the basis of someone's feet.
I think I have stated what my position on this contact was enough already. :D Peace |
Rut, to me, it "looks" like a travel before he dribbles. After he picks up the dribble, he travels again; this time we see the ball well enough for the call. Traveling was obviously not a priority for the officials here, as the white player did it on the put-back attempt.
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peace |
Quote:
Well if, with the chance to look at this play repeatedly on tape, you can't clearly see a travel, then apparently you don't call many. |
Geez, Rut, you're picking on words now.
JAR saying he "thinks" the guy traveled is like you saying that, "in your opinion" he traveled. Frankly, I saw enough on the video to call it on the 2nd one. The first one, with his back to the camera, I couldn't call because I can't see if he has control of the ball. In my opinion, the 2nd one is clear, though. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36pm. |