Quote:
Originally posted by Bart Tyson
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
[QUOTE
Because B1 violated,you can ignore the inadvertant whistle and readminister the foul shot by giving a replacement FT for the violation.This(I think)fits the language of CB6.7.5.As I said,if you do otherwise you could possibly be penalizing B twice for committing one violation,or awarding an extra shot for the official's screwup.
|
By your interptation I think A1 is the one who loeses by not getting the 2 for 1. If the official had not blown the whistle A1 would have 2 to make 1.
|
Bart,I gotta agree with that basic premise.The problem is that you can screw B,also,if you throw an extra FT in for A.The key question is whether the first FT after the inadvertant whistle is regarded as a replacement FT(with the B violation applied) or as the the initial FT(with the B violation delayed).That's what I'd like to see an approved ruling on,because that could determine the number of FTs.
Tue Apr 09, 2002, 02:01pm
Hybrid Mode
