NBA embarassment

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

The better analogy is to Mcnamee. His credibility is limited. He's made accusations that are refuted by the accused, in what started out as mere "he said, he said."

The difference, though, is that there may in fact be evidence which supports his accusations. I think it's a stained dress or something.

If Donaghy is able to provide evidence, or gets lucky enough to have someone else find some, that supports his acertion; all bets are off.

Jose Conseco?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Jose Conseco?

Might even be a better analogy if Donaghy comes out with a book.