![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
(someone has to step in for Padget when he is on his meds.)
__________________
- SamIAm (Senior Registered User) - (Concerning all judgement calls - they depend on age, ability, and severity) |
|
|||
i havent seen a gym with it moved back yet. I think everyone is going to need a shot clock with mounted on the support and led lights around the backboard pretty soon. Not this year though.
__________________
Tommy |
|
|||
Quote:
Salisbury University added teh new men's line over winter break. I was working their first women's game after that and during the first time out the assistant from SU asked me which 3 point line we were using!!! ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Best 3 years of my life.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Goaltending "change" is already there ?
Quote:
NCAA Rule 4 Section 34. Goaltending Art. 3. When the entire ball is above the level of the ring during a field-goal try and contacts the backboard, it is considered to be on its downward flight. In such a case, it is goaltending when that ball is touched by a player. |
|
|||
NCAA committee recommends change in goaltending rule
From ESPN http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=3392465
NCAA committee recommends change in goaltending rule INDIANAPOLIS -- An NCAA committee has recommended changing the goaltending rule so that a ball that is completely above the rim and has already hit the backboard could not be touched, regardless of whether it is on an upward or downward flight. "This change better defines and discerns the act of goaltending," Brad Jackson, chairman of the NCAA basketball rules committee and coach at Western Washington, said Monday. Previously, only a ball on a downward flight after touching the backboard was subject to a goaltending call. The proposal was one of about 50 by a joint subcommittee of the men's and women's rules committee. Only a handful of minor changes were approved, and those must be approved next month by the NCAA's playing rules oversight panel before they would go into effect. Among the proposals that were approved was one requiring home teams to wear light uniforms and visiting teams to wear dark uniforms, unless both schools agree to a switch. Previously, the light-home, dark-visitor uniforms were recommended, but not required. The men's committee took no action on proposed changes to the width of the free-throw lane. "The restricted area arc and the widening of the lane were dimensional changes that were considered and discussed," Jackson said. "However, our committee decided to continue to observe and study the effects these dimensional changes may have on our game." |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NCAA Rules help | NSABlue | Softball | 5 | Mon Apr 03, 2006 09:56am |
NCAA Rules only. | JRutledge | Basketball | 8 | Mon Oct 31, 2005 08:14am |
Help with NCAA rules | Jake80 | Basketball | 1 | Thu Feb 03, 2005 01:57pm |
NCAA rules | Hoosier Daddy | Basketball | 2 | Wed Jun 11, 2003 09:16pm |