![]() |
Fouling out?
I see Vitale is once again pushing his plan to eliminate "fouling out" and replace it with, essentially, an intentional foul everytime a player with more than a preset number of fouls (5 or 6) commits another personal foul.
Last year, it was apparently in response to Duke having all their players foul out in a game. This year, it's presumably in response to Georgetown losing their stud with only 16 minutes of playing time. Gotta love Dickie V; what a maroon. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hey - here's a novel idea. If you want to stay in the game, DON'T FOUL!
http://www.insurancetechguru.com/surprise.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
if it ain't broke dont fix it
|
Next thing you know, he'll want to tinker with the AP arrow rule...
http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/30896...5A1E4F32AD3138 |
Quote:
My understanding is that the Big East gave up the experiment because players were, surprise, commiting more fouls. |
On Mike and Mike in the Morning on ESPN radio this morning, Steven A. Smith wholly supported Dickie V's idea. He rationale ... of course ... the horrid nature of officiating both in the college and pro ranks the "last several years." It made me sick just listening to it.
|
Six Fouls ???
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08am. |